According to which culture's aesthetic sense? C'mon.
Oh, indeed... that was a confounding variable!
I think Matt may be on to something...Slightly more seriously, as a photograph involves a two dimensional representation of a three dimensional object, I think it would be safe to say that some of the three dimensional features of some people render in two dimensions more easily and more effectively than other three dimensional features.
"Photogenic" is culturally determined. If a portrait subject can be used to turn out face pictures like the ones in the popular "beautiful people" magazines then they are photogenic. If we lived in the Sara, Lobi, or Surma tribes the women with the biggest lip-discs would be the most photogenic!
You know some interesting guys, I'll give you that!Nice full hooters, slim waist, long legs. Cut the head off when cropping. There you have it
"She had a face that looked like a bag of spanners"In the words of Peter Britt, photographer, in Southern Oregon in the 1800's (in reply to a complaint):
"Madam, if you wish a photograph of a beautiful face, you shall have to bring one."
Vaughn
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?