Vaughn
Subscriber
That's rotten. There should not have been a dis-connect between the artist and the editors/publishers. It sounds like George Macy needed some help in selecting images, too. And there was a war on.I think since the reproduction failed the artist--Weston--the book fails as fine art. I do not have a first edition that Weston reacted so negatively to, but a much later one and the reproduction is mediocre. Apparently the original had a green cast to the photos as well as the paper, a choice the publisher made because of the book's title.
When considering book-making as a fine art, if a book fails, is it therefore not fine art...or just example of bad fine art? Obviously it becomes subjective very quickly.