What film do you use?

Barbara

A
Barbara

  • 1
  • 0
  • 35
The nights are dark and empty

A
The nights are dark and empty

  • 9
  • 5
  • 95
Nymphaea's, triple exposure

H
Nymphaea's, triple exposure

  • 0
  • 0
  • 46
Nymphaea

H
Nymphaea

  • 1
  • 0
  • 38

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,923
Messages
2,783,197
Members
99,747
Latest member
Richard Lawson
Recent bookmarks
0

bblhed

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2010
Messages
600
Location
North Americ
Format
Multi Format
If you want prints from slides, Dwain's photo does a nice job, I have never used them for prints but I have seen their prints from slides and they looked good.

If you don't mind some Digital in the process then have your slides scanned when they are processed and take them to a local 1 hour place that can print on FUJI CRYSTAL ARCHIVE paper from a scan. This is not unusual, my local Rite-Aid, CVS, and Walgreen's can all do this. To answer your next question, yes there is a major difference in quality between a gloss print on Crystal Archive and ink jet. Ink jet prints look like they were done on notebook paper IMO.

As others have said if you are not projecting your slides and you just want prints shoot color negative like Ektrar 100 and have it processed locally. If you want some artistic control have the film processed and scanned then crop and retouch then bring the photos back for printing, I know this is not a true full optical process, but it is better than ink jet prints. I can get a roll of C-41 processed and scanned to CD (on a $30,000 Noritsu scanner) for less than $3 a roll, optical prints (made from digital projection in the machine) on Fuji Crystal Archive run from $0.15 to $2.00 depending on print size and make ink jet prints look like the junk they are.

If you can get prints on Kodak Endura paper, they look great as well, but finding a place that uses Kodak optical paper is almost impossible.

Also wanted to mention that if you are worried about film by mail, don't I get film by mail all the time and it is fine, also your local camera shop gets film by mail a lot of the time as well.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,708
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
Portra 400 and 160.
 

Roger Cole

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
Sorry, it was mostly the modern cost and scarcity of Ilfochrome nowadays that I meant. I used to love Cibachromes, still have some beautiful ones and Fuji R prints. Now I just shoot negatives, color and B&W since no one wants to see my slide shows anymore but prints are still popular.

I have a slide duplicator and bellows and macro lens so I can make my own internegatives without much trouble aside from getting the internegative film these days. Regular color negative film ends up very contrasty when used.

I asked about internegatives here and was told that people are getting good results with Portra 160. Maybe preflashing could limit the contrast?

For that matter I find modern RA4 to be a bit too low contrast for my taste much of the time anyway so some contrast increase would be welcome, but sounds like you're getting quite a lot without (no longer made) interneg film.
 

photoworks68

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2011
Messages
55
Location
Greenock (Sc
Format
35mm

Roger Cole

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
Kodachnrome may be gone - sigh ! - but, thank god, there are still ektachrome available (100 g and 100 vs) :

http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/colorReversalIndex.jhtml?pq-path=1229

I have not tried 100 g yet, however i tried 100 vs and it is very nice.

I find 100G lovely stuff (see above for someone who doesn't like it quite as much) but it's not VS. Depends what you want. 100G is comparable to Astia, while VS is more like Velvia.

100G has very clean, natural colors, but not over saturated. For that really saturated look VS is better.
 

Dr.Pain-MD

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2011
Messages
141
Location
Vancouver, C
Format
Multi Format
E100VS is a lot easier to work with than Velvia. It scans a lot easier and the colors are a lot more balanced and natural, but very saturated and punchy. It's a great film if that's what you're looking for.
 

AlbertZeroK

Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2011
Messages
539
Location
Central Virg
Format
Medium Format
I have not tried e100vs, but I do like Velvia 50 over Velvia 100F. I also shoot the new Portra 160 and 400 which you can get in 35mm, 120 and 220. I do enjoy the off colors had by expired files at time, so I keep some fairly abused chrome in the fridge. But when I want excellent colors, it's the new Portra for negatives and Velvia 50 for slides.

Fuji 160s is also nice, not as good as the new Portra, but a good all around shooting film.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom