What are the Nikon lens legends?

OP
OP

ChristopherCoy

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
3,599
Location
On a boat.
Format
Multi Format
Craig75 said:
nikkor 6mm f2.8 is pretty legendary
Click to expand...

That's the huge fisheye that can nearly see behind itself isn't it?

ETA: Yeah, that's the one I'm thinking about. I don't see a point, or useable image in it, but hey... if it floats your boat.

 

BradS

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
8,120
Location
Soulsbyville, California
Format
35mm
The (non-exotic) Nikon manual focus F mount lenses that come to mind....
  • 28mm f/2.8 AIS Nikkor - probably apocryphal but the story I heard was that Corporate management gave design engineers free reign on this design. There are a couple related Nikkors that are as good - the 24mm f/2.8 AIS Nikkor for example.
  • 50mm f/2 Nikkor-H.C and the later and very closely related K and AI versions - Sometimes called the Japanese Summicron, it is a very good lens but every version of the later manual focus f/1.8 is better.
  • 105mm f/2.5 Nikkor-P.C and all of its manual focus decedents. Again, a spectacular lens. Try one and you'll know why it is legendary. I cannot think of anything that even comes close...maybe the contemporaneous Pentax 105mm f/2.8 Super Takumar and Super-Multi-Coated Takumar ?
  • 200mm f/4 Nikkor ... pedestrian performance but every Vietnam War era photojournalist had one and a dedicated Nikon F body.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

ChristopherCoy

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
3,599
Location
On a boat.
Format
Multi Format
BradS said:
28mm f/2.8 AIS Nikkor - probably apocryphal but the story I heard was that Corporate management gave design engineers free reign on this design. There are a couple related Nikkors that are as good - the 24mm f/2.8 AIS Nikkor for example.
Click to expand...

I've got the 24mm 2.8 D. I've never had the experience of the 28mm, but I wonder what the difference is between them. What did they put into the 28mm with "free reign" that they didn't put into the 24mm?
 

BradS

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
8,120
Location
Soulsbyville, California
Format
35mm
ChristopherCoy said:
I've got the 24mm 2.8 D. I've never had the experience of the 28mm, but I wonder what the difference is between them. What did they put into the 28mm with "free reign" that they didn't put into the 24mm?
Click to expand...

The D is auto focus though...isn't it?

Like I said, the story is very likely apocryphal...for example, there are several related lenses that also have CRC - like the 24mm f/2.
I especially appreciate the 28mm f/2.8 AIS and its 24mm sibling for their amazing performance in a compact and relatively light weight package. The 28/24mm focal length is also my most used small format focal length in urban environments.
 
OP
OP

ChristopherCoy

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
3,599
Location
On a boat.
Format
Multi Format
BradS said:
The D is auto focus though...isn't it?
Click to expand...

Yeah, it's a screw drive AF. I got rid of all my AF-G lenses and went with D versions so that I could use them interchangeably with my D700 and F5/F100 bodies. I've got the 105 2.8 D and the 24 2.8 D, my 50mm 1.8 is a G lens, but I plan to switch that out with a D lens soon.
 

BradS

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
8,120
Location
Soulsbyville, California
Format
35mm
@ChristopherCoy ....I've never owned an auto focus Nikon...so, it's all greek to me. I did briefly own a Canon EOS Rebel Ti with a 50mm f/1.8...used it like a very fancy and capable point and shoot. Never warmed to the Canon colors though...
 
OP
OP

ChristopherCoy

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
3,599
Location
On a boat.
Format
Multi Format
BradS said:
@ChristopherCoy ....I've never owned an auto focus Nikon...so, it's all greek to me. I did briefly own a Canon EOS Rebel Ti with a 50mm f/1.8...used it like a very fancy and capable point and shoot. Never warmed to the Canon colors though...
Click to expand...

The first AF lenses (I believe) were the D versions. When they were coupled with the bodies, a screw fell into place that spun either direction and allowed the lens to focus. Later versions of the AF lenses like the AF-S, AF-G etc had the AF motors built into the lenses. I know that the D lenses are backwards compatible with limitations, but I'm not sure about the later versions.
 

BradS

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
8,120
Location
Soulsbyville, California
Format
35mm
I do remember that the first 50mm f/1.8 AF Nikkor (AF-D ?) received high praise at the time of its introduction and may have achieved legendary status.
 

drkhalsa

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Messages
478
Location
Houston, TX
Format
Multi Format
Nikon began producing AF lenses in the mid 80's.

Then the AF-D lenses around '92. The D stands for Distance because the lens could send distance information to the camera for flash purposes.

I have an F5 and it works perfectly with AF-S and G lenses.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,693
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format

The issue with G and E lens is that they are limited to narrow range of bodies. G lens don't have aperture rings so N90s and like will not work or any MF body. The E lens will not work with some AF bodies and none of the film bodies including the F6. Most Canon EOS the EF mount lens will work with all bodies including film bodies, perhaps some limitations with first generation bodies.
 
OP
OP

ChristopherCoy

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
3,599
Location
On a boat.
Format
Multi Format

As do I. But there's something about the AF-S and G lenses that keeps them from being backwards compatible to a certain point. I just can't remember the details on it at the moment, but I know there was a reason I went for D lenses and nothing newer.

What version of AF lenses came before the D?
 

drkhalsa

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Messages
478
Location
Houston, TX
Format
Multi Format
They were labeled AF Nikkor. For instance, AF Nikkor 50mm f1.8, essentially the same as the newer 50mm f1.8 AF-D except without the distance info for the camera.

If my memory is correct, the AF-S and G lenses lack some functionality on the F4.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,003
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
As one who has never been all that interested in the Nikon offerings, it strikes me that this thread is basically an offshoot of the thread on religious topics!
 
OP
OP

ChristopherCoy

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
3,599
Location
On a boat.
Format
Multi Format
MattKing said:
As one who has never been all that interested in the Nikon offerings, it strikes me that this thread is basically an offshoot of the thread on religious topics!
Click to expand...

Really? Are we discussing lenses over there as well? I must have missed that.
 

benveniste

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 1, 2007
Messages
528
Format
Multi Format
I'm not sure that any lens rises to the level of "legendary," but I would like to get my hands on a 300mm f/1.4.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,003
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
ChristopherCoy said:
Really? Are we discussing lenses over there as well? I must have missed that.
Click to expand...
Canon vs. Nikon is surely as important a schism as Shiite vs. Sunni or Protestant vs. Catholic!
 

Oldwino

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 6, 2014
Messages
683
Location
California
Format
Multi Format
I’d have to nominate the reissue 50/1.4 s-mount lens, and the original (and reissue) 35/1.8 (both in s mount and LTM). And the Noct-Nikkor 58/1.2.
 

Larry Cloetta

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 21, 2015
Messages
176
Location
Jackson, WY
Format
35mm
200mm f/2 G ED VRII.
Not sure if it is legendary because not as many have had it as have had the more common ones mentioned here, but it’s one of the best lenses Nikon ever made.
 

Kyle M.

Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2013
Messages
558
Location
The Firelands
Format
Large Format
ChristopherCoy said:
That's the huge fisheye that can nearly see behind itself isn't it?

ETA: Yeah, that's the one I'm thinking about. I don't see a point, or useable image in it, but hey... if it floats your boat.

Click to expand...

It's not that it can nearly see behind itself, it can see behind itself.
 

Kyle M.

Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2013
Messages
558
Location
The Firelands
Format
Large Format
I've used nikon lenses from the 24mm 2.8 up to the 135mm 3.5. I have to say the ones I've been most impressed with are the 50/2 and the 35/2. I've shot with Nikon 50 1.2's, 1.4's, 1.8's, and the f2 and I have to say I prefer the 50/2. I like the 35/2 as an all around lens but there are times that a 35mm lens is too wide for my photographic style. I'm one of those people who could go there whole life with just the 50mm focal length and never feel like I was missing something.
 

davela

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
2,387
Location
Satellite Beach, FL
Format
35mm
Some notables I would consider in that category from experience:

24mm F2.8 any MF version
35mm F2 any MF version
180mm F2.8 ED any MF version
85mm F2 (Contax, Nikon, or Leica RF mounts)
28mm F3.5 (Nikon or Leica Thread RF Mounts)

There are others of course!
 

RLangham

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2020
Messages
1,018
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
BobD said:
The original 43-86mm was legendary as Nikon's worst lens.
Click to expand...
I believe I briefly had one. if I recall right I was irritated by its shortcomings although I did like the rendering of out of focus areas.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…