What am i doing wrong?

Double exposure.jpg

H
Double exposure.jpg

  • 0
  • 0
  • 77
RIP

D
RIP

  • 0
  • 2
  • 101
Sonatas XII-28 (Homes)

A
Sonatas XII-28 (Homes)

  • 1
  • 1
  • 103
Street with Construction

H
Street with Construction

  • 1
  • 0
  • 106

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,328
Messages
2,789,757
Members
99,874
Latest member
fauthelisa
Recent bookmarks
0

markbarendt

Member
Joined
May 18, 2008
Messages
9,422
Location
Beaverton, OR
Format
Multi Format
Wowwww now I'm really confused!

Far as I can tell the negatives look good and developed nicely. They were developed in DDX for 9 mins
I thought everyone was talking about the print not being developed for long enough at 1min in ilford multigrade....
Hey Tatty,

I understand your frustration.

The first thing I'd suggest is picking one time to use for developing your paper. Use a time that assures you can get strong blacks and use it every time. (This removes a variable for now. Later on when you get the rest figured out you can play with the developing time as a fine adjustment.)

The next thing to understand is the concept of place and fall with regard to exposure of photographic materials. You only get to place one tone, say black, with any single exposure. If you place black the rest of the tones just fall where they fall.

When you do your test strip pick the time where say, in your example, the shadows in her hair just turn black enough. (Using in focus areas works better IMO.)

To get say a proper white to go with your placed black, you adjust contrast, paper grade. That's what the filters do for VC paper.

Changing contrast generally means finding a new print exposure time to place your chosen tone, like that black you are wanting. Use a new test strip to find your black time, then print a proof.

If the proof is still too gray you need to use an even harder paper grade. If the print is too white move to a softer grade. Adjust contrast, find your black time, yet again, and print a new proof and make a new decision, repeat as necessary.

Yes this can be tedious especially when learning, but it does get easier with experience.
 
OP
OP
TattyJJ

TattyJJ

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2016
Messages
153
Location
Hampshire, UK
Format
35mm
Ok that makes more sense now.

The ilford was used at 1:9, so the time was correct to what they publish.
There is a chance the temp had dropped a little from when I checked it. Was bang on 20c when I mixed it, it then sat in the tray for prob 20 min while I was focusing etc.
But it won't have dropped more than 1 or 2 deg, the room was reasonably warm.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,039
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
I'd be surprised if the small drop in developer temperature such as your describe would have resulted in such a grey print. Given you printed without filters I'd say that your negative needs a greater contrast than unfiltered paper( about grade 2) will provide.

As at least one other has said, get a set of new Ilford MG below-the-lens filters. Harman Express will despatch them directly to you in 24 hours if you order before 3:00pm without any postage charge as the cost is more than £50. If you need anything else that Harman sell such as liquid developer, fixer etc you can add this to your order.

Frankly you cannot do without filters for darkroom printing with MG paper.

pentaxuser
 
OP
OP
TattyJJ

TattyJJ

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2016
Messages
153
Location
Hampshire, UK
Format
35mm
£50 is WAY more than I can afford right now, especially as there are already some in the darkroom.
They are Ilford ones, thin sheets of red/yellow plastic....

I should be able to sandwidge them between the negative and the light source. Or does it have to be bellow the negative?
Squeezing it in there will be trickier.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,339
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
The manufacturer's print developing time recommendation is probably fine.
But to Ilford data sheet for Multigrade developer indicates that low temperatures aren't recommended. So to check on your developing time, expose two identical strips and then develop one for the recommended 1 minute and the second for 2 minutes. Use stop and fixer normally. Rinse both briefly. If the results are similar, than 1 minute is sufficiently long to develop to (virtual) completion, and should be appropriate for future use at similar temperatures.
If there is a large difference between the two strips, your temperature or dilution require a longer developing time.
The developer I use is accompanied by a recommended developing time range. My personal preference is to use times that are nearer the longer end of the range because it helps maintain consistency - but that is the way I like to work.
And yes, you need to use the filters.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,339
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
£50 is WAY more than I can afford right now, especially as there are already some in the darkroom.
They are Ilford ones, thin sheets of red/yellow plastic....

I should be able to sandwidge them between the negative and the light source. Or does it have to be bellow the negative?
Squeezing it in there will be trickier.
You can lay them on top of some negative holders.
What type of enlarger is it? Some of us may have had one, and know some tricks.
 
OP
OP
TattyJJ

TattyJJ

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2016
Messages
153
Location
Hampshire, UK
Format
35mm
I will do some tests on developing times.
There are 2 safe lights, both the other side of the room to the enlarger, but one is no more than a meter directly above the sink where I did the developing.
How would I go about checking if this is causing a problem?
Also how would I go about checking the paper is ok?

Honestly can't remember the make of the enlarger, but see the pic below. I can't make out all the writing, but someone might recognise it? It the one on the right, obviously....

IMG_1219.JPG
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,339
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Here is KHB's information page for that enlarger: http://www.khbphotografix.com/LPL/LPL6600Cond.htm. That page indicates that there is a filter drawer in the condenser head.
You could also use the colour filtration in the other enlarger to adjust contrast for black and white work.
 
OP
OP
TattyJJ

TattyJJ

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2016
Messages
153
Location
Hampshire, UK
Format
35mm
I would like to use the colour one, mainly so i could do colour prints (not yet though!) but upon fiddling around i discovered the control box for it has literally been cut off and is missing! The pic is old of their website...
 

wiltw

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
6,460
Location
SF Bay area
Format
Multi Format
There are 2 safe lights, both the other side of the room to the enlarger, but one is no more than a meter directly above the sink where I did the developing.

How would I go about checking if this is causing a problem?
Also how would I go about checking the paper is ok?

If you suspect light leaks or safelight fogging, simply lay a piece of enlarging paper face up on the counter, put a few coins on the surface of the paper, and let it sit there for perhaps 5 minutes. At the end of the time, remove the coins and process the paper. If your darkroom is not 'safe', you will see outlines of the coins in the fogging around where the coins obscured the light.
If you see fogging, then you need to repeat the test to determine if it is incompatible safelight, or if the room has light leaks...run another test with safelight turned off, if fogging, then you know room itself has leaks.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
TattyJJ

TattyJJ

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2016
Messages
153
Location
Hampshire, UK
Format
35mm
It does have a little drawer at the top with a glass plate and a lens in, i did wonder if that was where a filter would go, but it also got pretty warm in there after being on for a while focusing and lining the image up. Was slightly worried the filter would melt....
 

wiltw

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
6,460
Location
SF Bay area
Format
Multi Format
It does have a little drawer at the top with a glass plate and a lens in, i did wonder if that was where a filter would go, but it also got pretty warm in there after being on for a while focusing and lining the image up. Was slightly worried the filter would melt....

That is probably the condensor lens which adapts the light head for a particular film format, and not a drawer for filters. Filter drawers are meant to be slid out rather simply, while condensor assemblies ordinarily require some modest 'dissassembly' of the head. Ordinarily filter drawers are a metal frame for filters with no optics. But one possibility is that there is a UV filter or heat absorbing filter.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,339
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
If you suspect light leaks or safelight fogging, simply lay a piece of enlarging paper face up on the counter, put a few coins on the surface of the paper, and let it sit there for perhaps 5 minutes. At the end of the time, remove the coins and process the paper. If your darkroom is not 'safe', you will see outlines of the coins in the fogging around where the coins obscured the light.
If you see fogging, then you need to repeat the test to determine if it is incompatible safelight, or if the room has light leaks...run another test with safelight turned off, if fogging, then you know room itself has leaks.
wiltw's test will work, but there are some refinements that make it better.
First, it works better if you can do it on a piece of enlarging paper that is partially exposed - to give a slight grey tone. This helps test for safelights that degrade contrast without fully fogging your print.
Second, if you have a number of coins, it is useful to use several sizes (1 cent, 5 cents, 10 cents, 25 cents, etc.) and leave them on for different times. Try putting 4 of them on at the beginning and removing one each at 1 minute, 2 minutes, 4 minutes and 6 minutes with the paper remaining where it is for a further 2 minutes. Then turn off the safelight and in complete darkness start developing the paper for 1 minute (count slowly to sixty). Transfer the paper to the stop bath, and you can turn the safelight back on and finish.
The paper will have had 5 different levels of exposure to the safelight - 8 minutes, 7 minutes, 6 minutes, 4 minutes and 2 minutes. If any of the coin outlines are visible, than you have a safelight problem. The outline or outlines that are visible tell you how much exposure is safe.
 

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,561
Format
35mm RF
You should look at the print NOT the clock when developing a print. The print will tell you when development is finished.

I would beg to differ, as you are then judging the print under darkroom lighting conditions. By keeping the time/temperature constant you can then adjust exposure after viewing the test strip/print under normal lighting.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,039
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
It worries me that you mention yellow and red filters unless these are the colours you think you see on the colour head. Actually the colours are yellow. magenta and cyan. On a closer look at the separate filters are they pale yellow and then progressively more magenta? This is what MG filters should be. You could use these but they may be old and faded. I'd use the colour head filters which don't fade and then as a test try out the separate filters to see if they match the grades from the colour head filters and give as good a print. Unless the separate filters have the grade numbers on them you may have to experiment to make sure you have them in the correct grade sequence.

Despite money being a problem I'd try and obtain Tim Rudman's book : "The Photographer's Master Printing Course" as soon as possible. Worth its weight in gold, in my opinion. Abe Books or Alibris should have secondhand copies for a reasonable price

pentaxuser
 
OP
OP
TattyJJ

TattyJJ

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2016
Messages
153
Location
Hampshire, UK
Format
35mm
It worries me that you mention yellow and red filters unless these are the colours you think you see on the colour head. Actually the colours are yellow. magenta and cyan. On a closer look at the separate filters are they pale yellow and then progressively more magenta? This is what MG filters should be. You could use these but they may be old and faded. I'd use the colour head filters which don't fade and then as a test try out the separate filters to see if they match the grades from the colour head filters and give as good a print. Unless the separate filters have the grade numbers on them you may have to experiment to make sure you have them in the correct grade sequence.

Despite money being a problem I'd try and obtain Tim Rudman's book : "The Photographer's Master Printing Course" as soon as possible. Worth its weight in gold, in my opinion. Abe Books or Alibris should have secondhand copies for a reasonable price

pentaxuser

I was referring to the box of square plastic filters, that appear red/yellow depending on which one your looking at.
Are they red, are they magenta (probably)? It's semantics really, you know what i was talking about :smile:
 
Last edited:

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,039
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
I was simply wondering if they had faded in which case the magenta one might have changed to what looked like a red colour. Unless you can be sure that each filter gives the right change of grade then using them could be frustrating when trying to improve your printing skills.

pentaxuser
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Before doing anything like changing paper grade/filtration it is very important to determine whether you are developing the prints sufficiently. Make 3 test strips; recommended developing time (1X), 1.5X, and 2X. Then evaluate the results. As I mentioned before it is common to over-expose a print and then pull it when it starts to become too dense. You should always develop prints normally so that if hey are too dense you know how much to decrease exposure, Pulling them gives you know useful information.

Using VC paper without a filter usually produces the equivalent of grade 2.5. Of course the exact value depends on the manufacturer as they each have their own standards.
 

rpavich

Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2015
Messages
1,520
Location
West virginia, USA
Format
35mm
It does have a little drawer at the top with a glass plate and a lens in, i did wonder if that was where a filter would go, but it also got pretty warm in there after being on for a while focusing and lining the image up. Was slightly worried the filter would melt....
It looks like it has a little filter holder under the lens. Does it?
 

rpavich

Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2015
Messages
1,520
Location
West virginia, USA
Format
35mm
You know...with as confusing a thread as this is, you be farther ahead to have a phone conversation with a member, email pictures for reference while on the phone if necessary. Real-time communication would be valuable.
 

LAG

Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
1,006
Location
The moon
Format
Multi Format
...There are 2 safe lights, both the other side of the room to the enlarger, but one is no more than a meter directly above the sink where I did the developing....

Safelight should be safe at any time but also in Any Area! (wet & dry), that means not only the safe-light itself / leaks (in & out). If you move from one side to another in the dark with sensitive material with you, you should also bear in mind "the distance" (intensity) from the point source (Inverse Square) then. If your light is fixed, you should test "those places" as well.

Best of luck!
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom