Referring to removal of batteries? Removing batteries from photography equipment is pretty much a universal standard. Not only does every user's manual recommend it, if one does any camera repair work at all, one would know corroded batteries are a frustrating and preventable complication.
View attachment 339633
This is my experience, too. I avoid alkaline batteries when I can. Much prefer lithium over all, but silver oxides are pretty stable. My QL17/GIII has had its MR9/386 silver oxide battery in it for more than 2 years and it's just fine.In my direct and indirect experience (I worked for a few years in retail camera stores):
Alkaline cells in photographic equipment are prone to leaking.
Silver oxide cells in photographic equipment are unlikely to leak.
I used them once for a Konica Auto S3 and each battery last about a couple of months. Zinc-air batteries produce electrical energy by contact with oxygen in air, so as soon as the sticker is removed the battery starts depleting (self-discharge). Opposite to other kind of batteries, it is a bad idea to remove them from the camera if they are not sealed again.
In my direct and indirect experience (I worked for a few years in retail camera stores):
Alkaline cells in photographic equipment are prone to leaking.
Silver oxide cells in photographic equipment are unlikely to leak.
Do rechargeable batteries leak? Are there silver-oxide AA/AAA, or only as button cells?
My experience is that alkaline cells made in the last 10 or 5 years tend to leak a lot more than cells made before that.
I am guessing that if someone were to make an adapter like the MR-9, except made to hold two batteries rather than one, the cost to manufacture the 2-battery version would not be much higher(?)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?