I bought some EcoPro a while back when I couldn’t find any Xtol, and it’s great. I didn’t do a side-by-side comparison with Xtol-developed negatives (i.e., same scene, same light, same exposure and development), but the EcoPro worked perfectly, and I can’t tell the difference. I checked prices recently, and one of the big retailers (B&H? Adorama?) charged $2-3 more for the EcoPro than for Xtol. Weird.
We appear to be back to the same question I posed in #51 about whether Legacy Eco Pro is the same stuff as Xtol. If it is then presumably if the Xtol problems are now resolved and it is now as cheap then that covers your decision making process with regard to Xtol quality, I hope. That leaves supply and price. If you are now out of Xtol and can't wait until mid February then is there still Legacy Eco Pro still available? If there is then you may have to buy it at least for the interim period. If it is the same stuff and is still more expensive then check out Foma's equivalent to see if that works our more expensive. It may do and unless some U.S. stockist has the Foma product then the wait period may rule it out
The key question with reference to Xtol quality v Eco Pro remains: Is it the same stuff?
I have no idea how this can be established unfortunately. Donald Qualls doesn't think this can be done based on his #52 and he may well be right
I can only hope that my posing of what I see to be straightforward questions to help you to decide does not upset Donald again but they seemed relevant last time so I am simply posing them again in an attempt to help you reach a decision
pentaxuser
I am also interested in Adox's solution, relistan. CHS ii is my fav 100 speed sheet film and I ADORE their MCC papers! I think the quality would be there, although being in the US, once Kodak sorts out their XTOL woes, it might be a hard sell due to shipping. I usually order from FotoImpex about once a year to buy some Adox and Rollei stuff and that ends up working well. So that is an option if/when they release their own XTOL-like product.
The XTOL I have in cool storage I bought when Tetenal announced that it was insolvent. I love that XTOL, I have at least 15 packages. I wouldn't touch anything from Sino - Kodak until I could be sure. I have some of the Eco Pro stuff someone gave me. I've never tried it, have no plans to, but I'm sure it would work.XTOL and the answer is no.
The original stuff. Smelled like my elementary school music teacher's breath.HC-110
That works fine if your working bottle is filled exactly to cap level. If, like me, you're using commercially made 2L bottles for your working solutions, and mixed to 2L because it was easy and I was diluting from 4L because I didn't have a 5L mixing vessel -- that leaves an airspace. I could, I suppose, add enough replenisher to bring the contents up to the cap, but it simply hadn't occurred to me.
Also, I'd initially read the comment I replied to to suggest replenishing in the tank rather than replenishing the working solution storage bottle before pouring back the tank contents.
Have you tried both, Andrew?
Harman has no chemical manufacturing capacity.Okay, so if LegacyPro products were made by Kentmere before the Ilford, does that mean some division of Harman Technologies is now making and selling LegacyPro and EcoPro developers?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?