Lightproof
Member
- Joined
- May 3, 2009
- Messages
- 81
- Format
- Medium Format
I like to save energy and was always interested in alternative light sources such as LEDs et cetera.
The point is, these substitutes can just not compete a light bulb yet. They have major drawbacks (warmup times, colour temp, electromagnetic tolerance issues, aging effects, hazardous materials...). And as we all know, the structure of artificial light has a major impact on quality of living.
All these alternatives are at least costly and I stopped trying them out because this habit became more environmentally polluting than the use of a common bulb.
It is not about saving the environment, it is about bureaucracy. This law saves the jobs of some more or less clever marionettes in the EUdSSR. From the beginning on we were told that this law was adopted in conformance with the industry.
There is one thing for sure: The traditional light bulb will survive the EU. To hell with these undemocratic )/&%ers!
The point is, these substitutes can just not compete a light bulb yet. They have major drawbacks (warmup times, colour temp, electromagnetic tolerance issues, aging effects, hazardous materials...). And as we all know, the structure of artificial light has a major impact on quality of living.
All these alternatives are at least costly and I stopped trying them out because this habit became more environmentally polluting than the use of a common bulb.
It is not about saving the environment, it is about bureaucracy. This law saves the jobs of some more or less clever marionettes in the EUdSSR. From the beginning on we were told that this law was adopted in conformance with the industry.
There is one thing for sure: The traditional light bulb will survive the EU. To hell with these undemocratic )/&%ers!