They have no agenda to attack us, maybe, they don't have an agenda to tear us off, maybe, but they certainly have an agenda to suck our blood.They are not ripping you off. They are doing what they need to continue to supply us with consistent quality products. You may be surprised to learn that they do not have an agenda to attack or destroy you. Do you have any understanding of the complexities involved with producing consistent quality film products?
At least I can still purchase ColorPlus at a reasonable price (for now). Didn't Fuji axe C200?
Not Agfa-Gevaert! They are still alive and kicking with production facilities in nine coutries.... Agfa-Gaevaert...
Not Agfa-Gevaert! They are still alive and kicking with production facilities in nine coutries.
And the chairman is a drunkard and a woman minister. His reputation is so bad and the other's friend is Ricoh. - Don't fool yourself with those fools, my friend. These are a bunch of bad guys.
They have no agenda to attack us, maybe, they don't have an agenda to tear us off, maybe, but they certainly have an agenda to suck our blood.
- The evidence is that they are a company that has no general principle and no unified ideology,
- Fuji announced that it will reduce production to try to reduce costs and at the same time increased prices,
- But it turned out that this step was to get rid of the stock of fermented solutions that were in their stores and used in the manufacture of films,
- When the fermented solution stock ran out of its stores, Fuji announced that it would stop production entirely for some categories of films, and continued to stop manufacturing some categories of films slowly, and was about to completely stop producing everything related to photography, And suddenly we find that it announced the reproduction of films again ,,, !!!!
Why did she come back to announce that she was going to make films and started producing Acros?
The reason is that it is a vile and evil company, after seeing that there is a growth in the analog market by six percent annually, and after Kodak announced the reproduction of films, Fuji despicable found that there is a rich from that war and must take advantage of it and take Her share of the analog cake after the analog imaging body came to life again.
- is a company without ethics -
And the chairman is a drunkard and a woman minister. His reputation is so bad and the other's friend is Ricoh. - Don't fool yourself with those fools, my friend. These are a bunch of bad guys.
The issue has nothing to do with hate and love.funny, how today when there is praised earned for a company, then its, well thats what their business is, and it gets passed by. but when people dont like a business decision a comany makes, then its all out war and attacking from upset, Ill call it like I see it, entitled people, who think that the only reason company A is in business is to provide what those people like, need and want. And the company should do it at a price that they want it at.
if you dont like fuji, great dont buy their film. but you (whoever you are and you know who you are) only label yourselves when you rant nonstop like a spoiled child. we got mickey mouse or whatever his name was finally kicked out of here. looks like we have another volunteer. take you bitch session to the soap box forum. you made your points, so let the rest of us have a peaceful discussion about the thread topic. please, do us a favor and shoot digital. your crying will fit in well with the digital boards out there.
ill get off my soapbox now.
I like and still shoot slide film. yes its more expensive, but i did buy a bunch+ rolls last year before the last price hike, right after fuji gave us notice of a price increase.
Isn't the "Report this Post" function wonderful!
Me too but from what I read, our "friend" mohmad should be banned if he cannot keep up with a peaceful conversation.
please, do us a favor and shoot digital. your crying will fit in well with the digital boards out there.
..........the 2 best films ever made, Kodachrome 64 and Pan-X!
the options are numerous.
I felt the same about RattyMouse. It wasn’t always easy to agree with his points but I don’t find him particularly offensive. But this thread will soon be pared down by a moderator or closed so who cares...I don’t know, he seems nice.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?