• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Turning a Crown Graphic into a Field camera

Rakuhito:
Frequently the leather can just be peeled off, Sometimes it needs to be encouraged. A mild solvent such as alcohol or the more aggressive acetone will take most of the glue holding the leather off.
A light sanding, some stain & a varnish or polyurethane to seal & finish and voila a newish camera
 
Removing leather

Mine came of in strips using pliers, then the glue washed off with water, just don't allow the wood to stay wet longer than necessary. A little fine steel wool will speed the process. Mine was finger jointed mahogany, and I finished it with a light coat of stain wiped on and spray can clear polyurethane. I also sprayed the inside with flat black paint after masking the exterior. The brass I soaked in paint remover because some of it had been painted, then a weak (diluted with water) muriatic acid (swimming pool ph adjusting chemical) solution and steel wool to remove the oxidation. Then I sprayed those parts with a clear laquer made for metal before re-assembling.
 
Here is my (modified for field use) CG
 

Attachments

  • CG.JPG
    253.6 KB · Views: 277


THAT'S what they do in my neighborhood, then put hydraulic systems on them to make them jump up and down.

tim in san jose (home of the 'low rider')

P.S. I have thought of doing this to my 3x4 Speed but ya know, I do have a 1926 Trona that fits the bill unstripped.
 
An easy way to remove leather.


It's really quite simple and works fast. Simply fill the teapot and set it to boil. Open the spout and hold the camera over it. The leather can be removed super easy as the horse hide glue will loosen and the leather will wrinkle up. Pull off or use a scraper with care. Forget the solvents. Hazardous and messy.

I have a couple of bodies striped waiting for a design that will allow me to pull the cover off and fix a dedicated lens to it like a Hobo. I'd like to keep the rangefinder on it tho. I also figured that by putting a tripod adpater into the center of the front cover, and reworking the front cover arm guides inside the body you could get back tilts.
 

Well, it's your camera, so you can do whatever you want with it--but you did ask for opinions, so I can only say that I would never mutilate a nice classic camera. Not even to save a few ounces. Someday you may want to handhold a shot and need to focus in a hurry--and where will you be without the rangefinder? Cutting down on your options with such a flexible camera makes no sense to me.
 
Chazzy: I appreciate your point of view...for most of my cameras, that holds true. However, the point to me was that if I were to buy a field camera, it would cost a lot more $$ than the Graphic...and I know if I wanted another press camera, I could easily buy one, since theses days, they sell relatively cheaply on the bay. However, I don't have aspirations to trying to recreate the press photographer with a 4x5 camera. If I were handholding a shot, I'd be using either MF or 35mm. I have a 2x3 graphic, which is easily hand-held, and I don't have any plans at all to mutilate that.
 
I think of the 4x5 graphic cameras as a classic design with added features to make it 'easy' to use. Rangefinder, viewfinder, wire frame, handle flash bracket, 4x5 graflock. But at its heart is a rugged 20-square-inch-film-eating american-made monster of a view camera. Leather, wood, or primer grey makes no difference to me. This camera was not made for the shelf or collectors case. Stripping all the fluff and getting down and dirty with some sheet film is what this camera is all about.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register