• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

To buffer or not

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
201,980
Messages
2,833,245
Members
101,046
Latest member
BettySchlueter
Recent bookmarks
0

mrred

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
1,251
Location
Montreal, Ca
Format
Multi Format
I'm beefing up D23 with lye to make it more active when developing reversals. I've seen many recipes that use borax as a buffer.

My understanding is the buffer is used to keep the PH stable for longevity. I plan to only use this as a one shot and I am not sure how much, if any, I would need to use.
 
OP
OP
mrred

mrred

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
1,251
Location
Montreal, Ca
Format
Multi Format
So the action can be considered localized on the surface?
 
OP
OP
mrred

mrred

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
1,251
Location
Montreal, Ca
Format
Multi Format
The difference with reversal 1st stage developing vs negative developing, is reversal requires much greater density build up. The more you have, the less solvent you need. The solvent is usually counter productive on quality when compared to a comparably developed image without.

I have just mixed up a concoction, based on D23 with the following ingredients added in order

dist water 700ml
pinch of Sodium Sulphite - assist the dissolving of Metol
Metol 7.5g - strait from d23 recipe
Sodium Sulphite 50g - d23 amount halfed. I am not looking for lower grain, as this grain that is developed get's removed. It does not really effect the final image
Potassium Bromide 5g - I have seen these higher amounts in other reversal formulas, and I have had problems with some films fogging too much
Borax 5 g - this is a shot in the dark, but likely needs more.
lye 10g - tested to give a ph of 12
dist water to make 1l

A quick dunk of a room exposed leader develops to pitch black in 30 seconds, noticeably in 5 seconds. (orwo n74+)

With this level of activity, I'm guessing I'm probably off on the level of buffer I need.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
A good buffering system is really only required for replenished developers. With these developers it is important to maintain activity at a constant level over a long period of time. For single use developers buffering is less important. in fact acutance developers such as the Beutler formula are poorly buffered by design. In addition the first bath of a two bath developer need not be buffered at all.
 
OP
OP
mrred

mrred

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
1,251
Location
Montreal, Ca
Format
Multi Format
Thanks Gerry. Any insight is helpful. Chemistry class 30 years ago is not much of a guide. :wink: Would removing the borax completely be ok?

I did a dry run this afternoon and I was surprised at my result. I inspected after the bleach and clear steps and discovered half the emulsion was gone. It was if I had used a lot of solvent. The next run with 1:1, gave a almost perfect positive which I was only able to achieve with a 1:1 with dektol and a solvent. This tells me 1) I have the activity I wanted and 2) I have a big fogging problem. The bleach must of removed all the fogged emulsion on the first try.
 
OP
OP
mrred

mrred

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
1,251
Location
Montreal, Ca
Format
Multi Format
After looking around the net, it looks like if I double the lye, remove the borax, add some more bromide and add some solvent, I will have D94 without hydroquineone. There is nothing like re-inventing the wheel....:wink:
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
You really shouldn't have to use lye (sodium hydroxide) as it will make the emulsion too soft and delicate and easily damaged. You could add sodium metaborate (Kodalk) or sodium carbonate instead. A paper developer like Dektol which has hydroquinone in it will also increase contrast. Have you looked at Ilford's instructions for reversal processing? http://www.ilfordphoto.com/applications/page.asp?n=90
 
OP
OP
mrred

mrred

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
1,251
Location
Montreal, Ca
Format
Multi Format
I have been reversal processing for a few years and have made it around the block two or three times by now. I have devoured virtually everything that was out there, good and bad. I do keep looking....

I didn't know that lye did that. However I do have a few pounds of Kodalk, but it doesn't go much above ph 10. I really needed 11-12. Sodium carbonate I have is not that fresh and there seems to be some hydration with it. Measurements with other recipes seemed to be off. I guess I could just add until I got the ph I needed, or get some fresh... :wink:

Dektol was adequate but I do have a few problems. The first is 4l of the stuff get's a little rank by the time I get to the end of it and the smaller packs are a blatant rip-off. I've been trying to focus on something I can make (I make everything else I use) so I can make how much I need and when I need it.

I live in Canada and it seems like I will have to wait for the second coming before I can get someone to sell me hydroquineone up here. It's amazing how much of it is around; look but can't touch. I have ascorbic acid, but have only a few grams left.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom