You aren't alone thinking it's b.s., and coming from a long time Leica user. The earlier gearing was in brass, so given a few years of use the gears lap together and become very smooth through wear, yet from the M4-P onwards they were made in steel (to be stronger for taking a motor drive), but it's the robust late cameras that get the criticism. It doesn't make any sense at all, especially as a Nikon F3 beats them all.
The myth of smoothness of leicas
-
A
- Thread starter Radost
- Start date
Recent Classifieds
-
For Trade View camera magazine back issues
- Started by MTGseattle
-
Want to Buy WTB Gossen Multibeam
- Started by Disconnekt
-
For Sale Sinar Norma 5x7 and 4x5 kit + parts
- Started by Guivd
-
Want to Buy WTB Viewfinder
- Started by Shaps
-
For Sale Wollennsak Apo lens
- Started by Peter Schrager
Forum statistics
You aren't alone thinking it's b.s., and coming from a long time Leica user. The earlier gearing was in brass, so given a few years of use the gears lap together and become very smooth through wear, yet from the M4-P onwards they were made in steel (to be stronger for taking a motor drive), but it's the robust late cameras that get the criticism. It doesn't make any sense at all, especially as a Nikon F3 beats them all.
Well, I am just saying there are small differences, I am not saying that this or that camera is "better" than another. My R4 and R6 are wonderfully robust and I throw them in my Chapman or Billingham bags without worries, whereas my M6 gets a much more tender treatment due to its fine-boned nature. But I love all of them.
You're saying you have 11 Leicas that need service??
Exactly. I have "only" 4 Leica bodies, 1 Barnack and 3 Ms. Every single one of them has been serviced/CLAed within the last few years and they are all butter smooth in use and quiet when fired. A rough wind or loud shutter on an Lecia is a cry for help.
It's funny, too, because I am a very long time Nikon manual F mount user. (I have too many of those too
I always admired the mechanical strength and durability of the Nikkormat/F/F2 family of machines. But after shooting a Leica, every time I go back to my beloved Nikons, they seem crude and inelegant by comparions. But they are the only game in town when I need something to abuse in bad weather or use with a long lens.
I'm surprised that Frank recommended that. He's a member of the Learn Camera Repair group on Facebook, and he discourages that in the group. The problem is that you're just moving the gunk elsewhere in the camera, and leaving parts with no lubricant, which causes increased wear.
I think it's a question of volume. If you flood a mechanism that way, you're right. But a surgical application in the right spot has saved many a mechanism for me. It does require self-control and knowing when enough is enough.
Exactly. I have "only" 4 Leica bodies, 1 Barnack and 3 Ms. Every single one of them has been serviced/CLAed within the last few years and they are all butter smooth in use and quiet when fired. A rough wind or loud shutter on an Lecia is a cry for help.
It's funny, too, because I am a very long time Nikon manual F mount user. (I have too many of those too
....Radost....
"Hi, I got a great deal on an M2. Cleaned and lubricated the slow speeds. Tried to do the same for the winder “which winds hard” but without success. Unless I don’t know exactly where to do it."
....Radost....
"Hi, I got a great deal on an M2. Cleaned and lubricated the slow speeds. Tried to do the same for the winder “which winds hard” but without success. Unless I don’t know exactly where to do it."
As it happens, I got a chance to inspect a just-CLAed absolutely beautiful black M4-P today. Guess what? It is absolutely not as silky smooth to advance the film winder on my M2, M4, or M5. I guess there is something to the theory that the older brass mechanisms "worked in" better and gave a better tactile experience that the newer post-M5 bodies.
Color me surprised.
P.S. I would love to repeat this test with a modern M6, M-A, or MP. If anyone would like to gift me any of these - for science, of course - I would be happy to report back here. I am a generous fellow that way ..
Last edited:
Yes I agree..... I've a few M4-2, M4-P...... the steel gears may help the motor-drive.... but I'll take a an M2/ M4 ( not much of a 50 guy so i'll pass on the M-3)....but they're all smoother than the post 1978 cameras......
& my '57 lllg is smoother too!
Exactly. I have "only" 4 Leica bodies, 1 Barnack and 3 Ms. Every single one of them has been serviced/CLAed within the last few years and they are all butter smooth in use and quiet when fired. A rough wind or loud shutter on an Lecia is a cry for help.
It's funny, too, because I am a very long time Nikon manual F mount user. (I have too many of those too
My Ms have seen lots of rough weather from the Alps to Alaska and the Himalaya and back.
Nikons are a soft spot with me too... as far a smooth....
A do-it-yourselfer.... complaining about smoothness of a Leica bought cheap....doesn't get any sympathy from me, but then again i don't do my own root canals.
They are precision instruments and operate superbly....needing only occasional service.
Yabut that Nikkor 180mm f/2.8 AIS...
Had several loved them!......but that Leitz 180 3.4 Apo-Telyt...... if i could have welded that on an F or F2.... instead of an R3.... heaven!
I have never gone down the Leica SLR... and ai ain't gonna...
Decades ago i bought one just for the 180 Apo-Telyt.....
Needless to say today i have an Nikon F..... and Leica Rangefinders.....
I have an original Leicaflex with its Summicron 50. It's like using an slr version of an M3 - with an impressive viewfinder.
According to internet wisdom, R is bad but SL and R9 are good.
I like my R6, no matter what.
I like my R6, no matter what.
Enjoy them R, though the original "smoothness" question was about M cameras which have shown far less radical change since being introduced in 1954.
my post was in response to Chuckroast's message.
Time to try something new maybe
Well I have a Nikkormat Ft, an Apollo F, an F2, and an F3. Other than that, I don't have any Nikon SLRs...
Don, since when does a camera need to be scintillating and not boring.... it's a tool, like a hammer...
Leica, Rollei, the name doesn't matter.....You've clearly never used a good hammer.
I find Nikons about as interesting as lined paper. Frankly, there's not one that's actually pleasant to hold.
A good hammer, on the other hand, needs to be balanced or, after a day of using it, your wrist feels broken.
I drove 80 pounds of 3.5" nails using a hammer one day. I know.
Sure Don. BTW may I ask why you have 15 or so boring Nikons?
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:  |