• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

The expense of shooting film

I just blew my photography budget for the year. Yes, I know, it's still March. I bought a box of Multitone paper (8 x 10", 100 Sheets) and six rolls of the current Bergger Pancro 400 in 120 size (I love this film for portraits). Fortunately, I found an old 100-sheet box of Oriental VCFB paper in 8x10, which I bought sometime around 2016 and stored in a relatively cool and dry cabinet, so it should be fine. That will let me print about 4 sheets per week, which should be plenty for my modest needs. I also have about twenty rolls of film left, which means I can shoot about 1 or 2 rolls per month, which I am very happy with. Chemicals are not a problem because I already have more than enough to last through the end of the year.

The most important consequence of the rising prices of film and paper for me is being a lot more selective about pressing the shutter release button. I don't see it as a limitation. I see it as a challenge to be a better photographer. I am curious to see how it goes.
 

Some might say this is only profit maximisation. That way you are helping the business economy. Well it sounds better that way, in fact that's almost patriotic, isn't it?

pentaxuser
 
I am glad I cut out the hooch a few years back. Hard to believe the cost of beer now.

I don't see how anyone would even want to blow $27 on a roll of slide film. Kodak is just shooting themselves in the foot. And $17 for a roll of ColorPlus?

It will be curious to see what happens but I'm not holding my breath. At least IIford has their sh#t together these days.
 

Just because you do not choose to bear the freight does not mean that others will not choose to.
 
I don't see how anyone would even want to blow $27 on a roll of slide film. Kodak is just shooting themselves in the foot. And $17 for a roll of ColorPlus?
Well there is a large body of opinion that suggests that those sorts of prices are here to stay because that reflects the genuine cost of making film. If they are right then the only options is : Get richer; Abandon colour film or cut down on its use

The light at the end of the tunnel is that if colour film's revival can stay on what is allegedly its current upward trend then maybe, according to some, the price relative to our incomes will fall - eventually

How many years of active film life do you have left to find out?

pentaxuser
 
Last edited:

Use color film and live a more forfilled life!
 
If I was having to pay big city prices for a pint, I’d go back to brewing my own like I used to before the craft breweries showed up here.

I'm happy with Trader Joe's 6 pack of Topsail Hazy Ale for $5.99. Lasts me at least a week or two, as I really am not much of a drinker.

But yeah, I see people complaining about the price of film, as they head to their local bar..

You pick your priorities. And you choose your nose. Wait, no, I think that's the other way round.
 
I'm happy with Trader Joe's 6 pack of Topsail Hazy Ale for $5.99. Lasts me at least a week or two, as I really am not much of a drinker.

But yeah, I see people complaining about the price of film, as they head to their local bar..
Or $tarBuck$
You pick your priorities. And you choose your nose. Wait, no, I think that's the other way round.

You can pick your friends.
You can pick your nose.
But you cannot pick your friend's nose.
 
Ha! My vintage car club meets up at a local coffee place. While I don’t drink coffee (I opt for herbal tea to be sociable) I see people paying $6-8 for a coffee that has more calories than a pint of ale.

BTW, I miss Trader Joe’s. There isn’t one in this state. I’m originally from Long Beach, CA so I know what we are missing.
 
Some might say this is only profit maximisation. That way you are helping the business economy. Well it sounds better that way, in fact that's almost patriotic, isn't it?

pentaxuser

You have a true talent for putting a curiously positive spin on things
 
Where the hell are you buying Color Plus for $17 ?

As for Ektachrome and Velvia prices.....those prices now reflect what it costs to manufacture and distribute the film plus a small profit margin. And believe me, that margin *is* small. It's not like anyone else is able to produce E6 film significantly cheaper. So you either swallow those prices or don't shoot E6.
 
The light at the end of the tunnel is that if colour film's revival can stay on what is allegedly its current upward trend then .

How many years of active film life do you have left to find out?

pentaxuser
Perhaps a color film's revival isn't enough to see nice pricing.
Therefore the revival has to be much bigger.
How many people shot film again ?
10.000 ? 100.000? 1.000.000? 10.000.000 ??

How many films per year would be necessary to come back to significantly cheaper prices? (worldwide)
Keyword : mass production.

I remember a number of (estimated) 4 billion sold films in 2002

.....have a nice day
 

Mmm... sounds like it might be as well to have some of those bitter almond pills just in case the light at the end of the tunnel postulated by some is the express train heading straight for us

pentaxuser
 

+1.
 
Mmm... sounds like it might be as well to have some of those bitter almond pills just in case the light at the end of the tunnel postulated by some is the express train heading straight for us

pentaxuser
May be you change to b&w film? ....if you compare pricing, a Polypan F is still not much expensive
 

Shoot a lot more film so that manufacturing expands, the market expands and the price will drop.
 
Shoot a lot more film

I don't think that the existing user base can do this. Kodak needs new customers and they're out there. But will the young enthusiasts buy the much more expensive Kodak product or choose competition, or even those funky lomo films - time will tell.
My hunch is that coming from digital perfection they're probably into the funky side of things.

It is good to see that the Kodak is in the black and doing well.

I like this quote:
"Our priorities for 2022 included providing our customers with uninterrupted supplies, reducing costs by improving operational efficiency and implementing pricing actions to realize the value of our offerings, which contributed to a year-over-year increase in gross profit for the fourth quarter."
So they 1) streamlined the production, made it cheaper to make film; 2) had problems keeping stock in stores; 3) experienced nice profit; 4) are looking for the max price customer is wanting to pay for Kodak film.
I, however, don't see Kodak sharing these savings with customer. Price increase for existing products is what we got instead.

So I truly don't know if growing market can make prices cheaper in this reality.
 
Last edited:

IK know the D200 had a bigger than usual battery drain but I never had a problem with it.
 
Anybody check the price of Velvia or Provia 8x10 film recently?

Not really because I don't use any. If you are not a Pro then 8x10 seems to be a bit of an overkill, don't you think so?
 

Or brew your own - it isn't that difficult. Vary the recipe and the strength can vary too, I once substituted the sugar for honey now that was something else! One pint of that home brew and you were anybody's.