berkeley mike
do all your students / students that go through your program go on to be paid working photographers?
or do some of them do it because they want to become proficient, you know like CE / elective classes ?
the lions share of people i have known or met who took photography classes at a university, college &c
who were not in a MFA/BFA program did it as an elective course .. and very few of the people who weren't in
the MFA/BFA program went past 3 semesters, or on to jobs that had anything to do with photography ...
other than enjoying themselves, knowing how to compose an image, how to process film
( or get it processed by someone ) &c .. you know, scratching their photography itch ....do your classes
link up with graphic arts/commerical arts classes ( illustration, design &c ) or classes that might give the aspiring
commerical photographer the knowledge of how their product, architectural portrait photographs/photographic illustrations
will be used & added to as communication art / graphics on the printed page or digital screen ?
i've always thought the way photography was taught either as a vocation or as an art missed these things and kind of left
the photographer hanging in the breeze wondering what to do next after they get their degree or certificate...
Excellent question and perspective.
The program is supposed to be vocational. Leadership through 2014 failed to actually create and execute along those modalities and failed, also, to stay abreast of contemporary developments in technology. That leadership was incapable of managing both having experience in neither. The department was split 50-50 and I was subsequently appointed by 2 consecutive Presidents as I have both and significant community/organizational/counseling experience.
Building the program meant understanding not only our vocational mission and the needs of aspiring pros, but the needs of [people who simply want to enrich their photographic skills. That said, there are actually only 2 classes focus specifically on pro skills.
Foundational classes, both entry-level Intro to Dig and Intro to film, History of Photo, Photojournalism, Second-level Digital, and HDSLR benefit all types of shooters. Intro to Pro (220), Intermediate Pro (230), Advanced Pro (240), the "Pro" classes, have been seen as just that. There was significant feeling that the "Pro" designation was hindering enrollment in Intro (220). When I took on the Saturday 220 there was an average of 4 students. I promoted 220 in the lower division classes by saying, ignore the "Pro" designation.
Instead, I told them that all I wanted to do was make them better photographers. I introduced more advanced metering, color balance, studio lighting and gear, basic sets and set building, on-camera flash lighting, shooting on location, night shooting, processing and delivery. People not only got much better and more confident but, whether shooters wanted to be pros or not, they were ready for Intermediate Pro. What this does is allows shooters to drop into the program and get some of the things they want/need for a class or two. Or...continue on to more sophisticated shooting and business skills needed to make a buck.
It is huge fun and work at the same time.