D23 1:1 and Rodinal 1:50 especially look virtually indistinguishable when "scanning" the negatives with a DSLR. I hope to be able to make a print in the darkroom next week.
With 100 speed film, it might just be that the grain is so small in both cases that your DSLR digitizing doesn't record it well.
This is a very surprising result -- I've had expected to see significantly less visible grain with D-23, even at 1+1, compared to any dilution of Rodinal. With 100 speed film, it might just be that the grain is so small in both cases that your DSLR digitizing doesn't record it well.
As an update, the producer has replied to my query saying that this metol is normally destined for professional use and that it was routed to the "amateur" market by mistake, claiming anyway that other than colour and the precipitate it is equivalent to the "white" version and can be used without issues.
The shop I bought it from is sending me a new jar with "white coloured" metol.
The actual prints actually showed that Rodinal is indeed grainier than the rest. More details here: https://www.photrio.com/forum/threa...odinal-vs-hc-110-in-35mm.182843/#post-2400153This is a very surprising result -- I've had expected to see significantly less visible grain with D-23, even at 1+1, compared to any dilution of Rodinal. With 100 speed film, it might just be that the grain is so small in both cases that your DSLR digitizing doesn't record it well.
The actual prints actually showed that Rodinal is indeed grainier than the rest. More details here: https://www.photrio.com/forum/threa...odinal-vs-hc-110-in-35mm.182843/#post-2400153
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?