• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

TechPan - how to develop without microdol?

stealthman_1

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 27, 2008
Messages
91
Location
Northern Cal
Format
Medium Format
I developed a roll (1994 expiration) the other day in RLC (6 minutes) and was quite pleased with the results, except that I think I over agitated it as evidenced in the sky. No visible grain, sure looked better than Tmax100 to my eye. I have a good bit of Technidol, but not as much as I have of TP.



Linky to 1000pixel version
 

Lee L

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
3,287
Format
Multi Format
RLC? Agitation pattern? Print or negative scan? If it's a print, what paper and grade was a good match?

Thanks.

Lee
 

trexx

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
291
Location
Tucson
Format
4x5 Format
It is nice to Rollie Low Contrast able to handle TP so well, the short development time makes it hard to do minimal agitation. The sky does show some over agitation, but controllable in printing.

What was your agitation style and how frequent?
 

stealthman_1

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 27, 2008
Messages
91
Location
Northern Cal
Format
Medium Format
This was scanned on an Epson v700. The agitation method was as Kodak recommends in this bulletin, but I did not fill the tank as instructed (it had been a while since I read the bulletin). I loaded the reel then poured in chemical in the light. So maybe it wasn't my agitation, but my sequencing.
 

gainer

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 20, 2002
Messages
3,699
Of what dilution, stock, 1+1, or 1+3?

Tom.

Stock. The salt will extend the developing time somewhat, but not nearly as much as bromide. You can dilute it about as you would Microdol.
 

dancqu

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
3,649
Location
Willamette V
Format
Medium Format
Stock. The salt ...

Stock? Good chemistry down the drain.
Salt? With TechPan? The grain is already
invisible.

Correct. Microdol is a low ph D-23 with likely
salt added. Just as well use, as I've suggested
in an earlier post this thread, D-23 at a 1:7.
Very little solvent action at that dilution.
Use it one-shot. I doubt the OP had
replenishment in mind. Dan
 
OP
OP

Andrey

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 14, 2008
Messages
299
Format
35mm
Thanks all. I will heed your suggestions.

This looks like something that'll take up some time to get used to, so I'll delay until the summer to experiment with it. Now I can barely shoot and develop the films I know.
 

gainer

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 20, 2002
Messages
3,699

I didn't say I would use it. I would not use Microdol either. As you say, developing TechPan in a "fine grain" developer is like carrying coal to New Castle... or West Virginia.
 

Larry Bullis

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 23, 2008
Messages
1,265
Location
White Rock, B.C. Canada
Format
Multi Format

Y'know, I have never cared much for the film, but i have to say that seeing your result makes it tempting. But, I'd sure find a way to slow it down. Longer development, gentle agitation - so much more reliable.
 

titrisol

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
2,096
Location
UIO/ RDU / RTM/ POZ / GRU
Format
Multi Format
Rodinal 1+100 or HC110 dilution H should do the trick
See here: (there was a url link here which no longer exists)
 

Murray Kelly

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 31, 2007
Messages
661
Location
Brisbane, Australia
Format
Sub 35mm
Morry's Technidol arrived! Only took 2 months by surface mail.
I note the baggies make enough for 250ml and my 16mm tank only needs 100-125ml. Would the other half freeze to keep?
Must remember to check the pH when made up, too.

Thanks Morry!

Murray

I have about 12 pkgs of Kodak Technidol Liquid Developer that I have no use for. e-mail me at morryk@telus.net and let me know where you are.

Morry Katz