My virus checker and my OS refuses to verify the program for download. It says that the source is unknown and cannot be verified.
I'm attaching the text of "Kitchen Tested Soups" in PDF form. If that works, I'll send the test photos in a couple of days.
That may be great or may be not good. My virus checker and my OS refuses to verify the program for download. It says that the source is unknown and cannot be verified.
PE
I'm attaching the text of "Kitchen Tested Soups" in PDF form. If that works, I'll send the test photos in a couple of days.
I down loaded it with no problem. Looks, acts and quacks like any .pdf file.
But expect no glory from this. Rather, expect to get whacked firmly around the head by multiple parties and spend the next month defending what you wrote 20 years ago.
Sandy
Actually it was 36 years ago, but who's counting? I'm more than twice as old as I was then, and have defended papers that were much more controversial than this one. It's going to be fun, as photography should be when practised as a hobby. I don't recommend teaspoons for pros, but I'll bet some of them use them sometimes.
I find that teaspoons work best for eating food and stirring hot drinks, but maybe that is just me.
Steve
Cold drinks too.
Remember that when I wrote that piece there was no such thing as a cheap digital scale. Even the balances for weighing gunpowder were expensive relative to an average paycheck. Most of those who could afford a good balance were either lab tecnicians or drug dealers, not government employees with a wife and six kids.
I PMed him and he sent me the information that I needed. I ended up get a 100 gm and a 1kg scale. The postage and handling costs rivaled the coast of the purchase.
I have saved a copy of the PDF. Thanks Patrick.I'm attaching the text of "Kitchen Tested Soups" in PDF form. If that works, I'll send the test photos in a couple of days.
I have purchase several analog Ohaus scales used of of epay, never more than $15-20 including shipping. I know the electronic are easier to use but they will not last as long. I also would worry about accuracy with the cheap ones.
The problem is that many chems are hygroscopic. The gain water weight as the get older. (Sounds familiar) That means the amounts will be all over the place because you have no real starting point.
Scales are cheap, $50 will get you a great scale. Get one that weighs in .1 or tenth grams. Trust me, you will be very happy you did.
If a chemical is hygroscopic, then the weight of chemical contained in a given sample will depend on the amount of water it contains, so neither volume nor weight will give you the exact amount of chemical contained in your sample.
I agree with Bruce. Why measure with a teaspoon when the cost of accurate scales is so inexpensive.
Have a look here, for example. http://www.balances.com/
Sandy King
It's worth pointing out that some kits for reloading ammunition use volume measurement rather than mass measurement, and reloading ammunition is a more critical operation than mixing photographic chemicals.
It's only critical if you care about ballistics.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?