Suggest a color film that's one step better than Kodak Gold or ColorPlus?

OP
OP

dcy

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
887
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm
Paul Howell said:
Minolta 7, Nikon F4 and Fs, Canon EOS 1N, Pentax MZ1, all under $500, under a $100, Nikon N90, N80, so other than price what is your criteria?
Click to expand...

The main one that those cameras don't have is compactness. Something like an Olympus XA and many (most?) rangefinders can fit in a pocket. I wouldn't go on a hike or to a farmers market with a camera strapped around my neck. If it was in my backpack, I'd end up not using it a lot.

The situation seems to be that I can have a camera that

(1) Fits in a large pocket.
(2) Has both auto mode and manual mode.
(3) Has a decent (say ... < $200) price.

"pick two".

In general, I can find:

(1) SLRs with a good price, and auto+manual modes, but are bulky.
(2) Rangefinders with a good price, but either no auto mode or no manual mode (e.g. Yashica Electro 35 GSN/GTN/GX/etc).
(3) Rangefinders with auto+manual mode, for $1,000+ (e.g. Contax G1, Konica Hexar RF).


Perhaps there's an option I haven't thought of. I don't know much about cameras, or the market.
 

aconbere

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2023
Messages
329
Location
Seattle, WA
Format
4x5 Format
I have an Olympus 35RC that I like a lot and has a simple shutter priority automatic mode as well as fully manual controls. Very compact little camera, very nice lens.

The Canon Canonette QL17 is a similar camera that’s reputed to be very nice (but one I haven’t used).
 

Taylor Nankervis

Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2024
Messages
283
Location
Vic/QLD Australia rota
Format
Multi Format
dcy said:
. Something like an Olympus XA and many (most?) rangefinders can fit in a pocket.
Click to expand...

That's likely all you will need!
My li'l Olympus XA is from 1983 — not a single fault or skipped beat — or any fault — ever over that time (and how much time are we talking about?). I don't use it as often (but I should); great little camera that still commands a keen following from collectors.
 

albireo

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 15, 2017
Messages
1,539
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Taylor, I've always wanted to have an XA but I've been really unlucky with these cameras..

I bought it twice. First an XA, then an XA4. The XA used but in excellent condition, the XA4 stone cold mint, close to unused, boxed from eBay Japan. The XA4 came with original labels, and price tags in Japanese and even a necklace doubling as a distance/focusing aid.

Both had significant issues when shooting and gave me objectively subpar pictures.

I never knew what was wrong with the XA, and I sent it back before I found out why the images were always soft with horrible corners. The left corner was softer than the right so I suspect lens element misalignment.

The XA4 had a faulty aperture which means all my pictures were shot wide open, resulting in overexposure and softness.

I returned both, and have -sadly- ticked the XA off my 'must own" list. Too risky in 2025.
 
Last edited:

Agulliver

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Messages
3,676
Location
Luton, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
I would suggest that over time you'll get used to how your Pentax 17 meters in various conditions and learn when you need to compensate + or - a stop or two. In reality, that's all you *need* to do.

I have a collection of cameras from the simplest box cameras taking in totally manual cameras, cameras with non-coupled meters and cameras with various different metering systems. And a light meter app on my phone (my Weston Mk III light meter died and is now a movie prop). But I also have 47 years of experience with manual cameras...and that really helps. You'll learn as you go, making mistakes but also finding that some tricky photos come out perfectly. It might be worth noting down the circumstances of your shots as you go, especially if you do make any adjustments, for later reference.....this worked, that didn't, oh look....that did something odd that worked out.
 
OP
OP

dcy

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
887
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm

Thanks!

I looked them up and watched a few reviews. I thought I knew about the Canonet, yet I didn't know it had a manual option. Ditto for the 35RC.

I can totally see myself buying one of those as a "second" camera. Being a product of the 1970s, it is not fair to complain that they cannot match a camera from 2024/5. I am sure that ISO 400 was considered fast in 1970. But having a manual option while still being pocket-size can earn them a place in my collection for when I want that experience.
 
OP
OP

dcy

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
887
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm
Agulliver said:
I would suggest that over time you'll get used to how your Pentax 17 meters in various conditions and learn when you need to compensate + or - a stop or two. In reality, that's all you *need* to do.
Click to expand...

Definitely.

Agulliver said:
But I also have 47 years of experience with manual cameras...and that really helps. You'll learn as you go, making mistakes but also finding that some tricky photos come out perfectly.
Click to expand...

Yeah. There's no replacement for experience. Already in the short year that I've had my camera I've noticed patterns that I now try to incorporate when I shoot.


Agulliver said:
It might be worth noting down the circumstances of your shots as you go, especially if you do make any adjustments, for later reference.....this worked, that didn't, oh look....that did something odd that worked out.
Click to expand...

I should definitely do that.

I've noticed a few times when I was trying something, sure I would remember, and by the time I got to the end of the roll 2 weeks later I can't remember what I was trying to do (e.g. "Hmm... I think I was testing exposure... but was I over or under exposing?..."). I should carry a little notebook with me.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

dcy

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
887
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm

Thanks again for mentioning those. I spent the last week reading, watching reviews, and learning about those cameras, as well as the close cousins Olympus 35SP and RD.

I just ordered a Canonnette QL17 from eBay. I think it's going to be a fun "second camera" that will let me shoot in manual mode when I'm in the mood for that, and still let me switch to shutter priority when I want.

In the strictest sense, I've "always" been able to shoot manual with my digital camera, but it'll be nice to have that option for film.
 

brbo

Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
2,288
Location
EU
Format
Multi Format
Canonet is a fine camera. Depending on condition, viewfinder will probably be much dimmer than what you are used to in Pentax 17 and you will need some luck to get one with contrasty rangefinder patch. Of course, one bad thing about it is that the meter does not work in manual mode.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

dcy

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
887
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm

Yeah. If the viewfinder is as clear as the one in my Olympus Pen EE, I'll be more than happy. Buying from eBay is always a bit of a gamble, but the pictures in the listing looked "pretty good".

Last week I bought an Argus C3, mainly as a collectible. Now that camera has a dim viewfinder. I haven't tested it yet.
 

reddesert

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
2,540
Location
SAZ
Format
Hybrid
I used a Canonet QL17 a lot in the 1990s to early 00s. It is good. One minor irritant is that you have to turn the aperture dial to "A" to get a light meter reading and then turn it back to your desired aperture. I think the light meter on the one I used back then is no longer accurate, but I have some others. Often you will have to do something about light seal foam on the back that has deteriorated.

There are lots of other auto/manual modest-size RFs from that era, Olympus (35RC), Minolta (Hi-Matic 7?), and others made them. I like the Konica auto S2 as well (first of this type I owned), but it is bigger than a Canonet. At the time (1960s to early 1980s), these occupied the market niche of roughly amateurs who wanted something better than an Instamatic, but not ready or willing to buy into an SLR. They were eventually displaced by the 35mm AF point-and-shoot.
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,819
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
Also, for the Canonet please start doing your homework on batteries and conversion alternatives. That camera is from the (now banned) mercury battery era. I used a CrisCam voltage dropping adapter with silver-oxide cell to great advantage with my QL17 GIII. Nice camera when in good operating condition.
 
OP
OP

dcy

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
887
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm
BrianShaw said:
Also, for the Canonet please start doing your homework on batteries and conversion alternatives.
Click to expand...

It would've been a bit foolish of me to not start doing that homework before purchasing the camera.

I haven't yet decided on which alternative I will go for, but I think I've narrowed it down to three:

(1) Quick & Cheap & Wrong --- Just pop in an LR44 and hope for the best. --- The wrong voltage and wrong discharge curve will make the meter inaccurate by +/- 1.5 stops, ranging from -1.5 to +1.5 as the battery discharges over a few months. An LR44 has a smaller diameter than an PX625, so I imagine it rattles too.

(2) Quick & Expensive --- Buy the WeinCell PX625 battery replacement. Some sources recommend it as the most reliable drop-in replacement for the mercury battery. $6.67 for a battery that dies in 30 - 90 days.

(3) Buy Once, Cry Once --- The option you went for. Buy a $40 CrisCam MR-9 voltage dropping adapter and use silver oxide 386 batteries from then on.

Yeah... I'm thinking of buying the CrisCam.
 

blee1996

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
1,342
Location
SF Bay Area, California
Format
Multi Format

There is another option
4) Compromise: buy a dumb adapter (brass $5), and use 675 zinc air hearing aid battery (1.4v, $0.35 each). This is exactly equivalent to WeinCell.
 

aconbere

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2023
Messages
329
Location
Seattle, WA
Format
4x5 Format

Because what is this hobby except a never ending series of rabbit holes… I installed a Schottky diode in the camera to bring and SR44 down to 1.37V
 

reddesert

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
2,540
Location
SAZ
Format
Hybrid
Honestly, I used to use an alkaline battery in my Canonet and I think the meter was only off by about a half stop over the range that I used it. You may not even know if the meter works yet.

I used a PX625A, which may not be easy to get any more, but is the right shape. I suspect that if one puts an LR44 in, it will slide around and not make good contact. It can be shimmed with aluminum foil.

The light meter on any of these older rangefinders is a not particularly sophisticated averaging meter so it is also important to learn to use such a meter and its limitations.
 
OP
OP

dcy

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
887
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm
blee1996 said:
There is another option
4) Compromise: buy a dumb adapter (brass $5), and use 675 zinc air hearing aid battery (1.4v, $0.35 each). This is exactly equivalent to WeinCell.
Click to expand...



I should've waited 1 more minute before buying.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
54,172
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
You didn't make a bad decision.
There is a whole world of older cameras that you can use that CrisCam adapter in - e.g. the Olympus OM-1 - and enjoy long battery life.
At the same time, those dumb adapters work great with the hearing aid batteries, for when you are happy to more frequently change cheap and very easy to obtain batteries.
I have happily used both approaches.
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,819
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format

... and a whole world of meters too.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
54,172
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
BrianShaw said:
... and a whole world of meters too.
Click to expand...

Brian - we don't want @dcy to go down the same rabbit hole that some of us have already travelled, do we?
Not only too many cameras and too many lenses to choose from, too many hand meters as well!
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,819
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
DCY is the master of his own destiny. He seems to love rabbit holes and that’s a good thing because every hole leads to a fascinating discussion thread. He’s already “one of us”. I like the way he thinks and overthinks!
 
OP
OP

dcy

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
887
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm
BrianShaw said:
DCY is the master of his own destiny. He seems to love rabbit holes and that’s a good thing because every hole leads to a fascinating discussion thread.
Click to expand...

It's a bit of a battle for me. I honestly think that the world is an interesting place and the more you dig into a subject the more fascinating it becomes. But trying to explore everything isn't healthy for me. One of the reasons I chose photography as a hobby is that it gets me out of the house and on my feet. Every rabbit hole is interesting, but I need to be judicious about which ones to follow.


BrianShaw said:
He’s already “one of us”. I like the way he thinks and overthinks!
Click to expand...

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…