Do you get the same pattern regardless of the scanning resolution? Does it stay the same if you enable multi sampling (like 2x, 4x..)?
Based on what I understood about electrical noise, it should be more gaussian random. I can see pattern for each motor stepped here (so, I incline to think that this is not really noise). I joined Nikon Coolscan facebook group last night (they actually have very good info around these scanners). One of the post stated that this may be due to CCD wearing out, though, the pattern seems to not exact what I and cramaj have.
Updated: Look like the group has some fix by replacing A/D capacitors. In case, you have problem and handy with electronics.
What is shown here is like posting an image of a underexposed area where the remainder of the image is perfectly OK
Is the perceived problem something more basic like the medium you are scanning was originally taken in a light which was not a correct colour balance.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?