- Joined
- Oct 11, 2006
- Messages
- 2,185
- Format
- Multi Format
Probably a very negligible effect though.Bad idea, Vaughn. Remember that a water stop bath works relatively slowly by simply diluting/washing the developer out, not chemically stopping the developer. Development does not stop immediately. So if the lights are on, exposing the film or paper, while development is slowing down but still happening...
I'm sure that the "documentation" would relate to commercial processing throughput and fixer efficiency and longevity.Is it just me, or has anyone else noticed that no one on this thread has produced even one example of documented experimental evidence that stop bath vs. water makes even one scintilla of difference in film processing?
I'm sure that the "documentation" would relate to commercial processing throughput and fixer efficiency and longevity.
With a side of development precision, of course.
Is it just me, or has anyone else noticed that no one on this thread has produced even one example of documented experimental evidence that stop bath vs. water makes even one scintilla of difference in film processing? For paper processing this may be a bit more of an open question, but I don't think anyone anyone has demonstrated a difference there either.
To me it's kind of like putting on the breaks when approaching a stop sign. You can either put the brakes on a little early and slow down gradually (like a water stop), or slam on the breaks at the last instant and slow down real fast (like an acid stop). Either way you end up in the same place and in the same final state.
....Ryuji Suzuki used to post here, but not lately....
What puzzles me is a variation of what maybe exactly the same point that Alan Rockwood appears to be making, namely: If stop bath stops the developer action instantly and water stop bath slows most of it instantly and within x seconds has stopped it then unless x in x seconds is more than a few seconds how much difference does this make to the extent of the film's development? Most of my dev times are over 10 mins so does an extra 5 secs( to be generous) of development over 600 secs make a noticeable difference to the negs that result in a difference in the subsequent print that cannot be corrected ?
I haven't seen the scientific evidence yet but if it is out there can someone please provide it?
Thanks
pentaxuser
In my experience, a stop bath for FB paper prevents later staining. Maybe my metabisulphite stop bath helps wash out developer. I don't know, I just know what has been working for me since I started using stop bath instead of water. Maybe my water rinse wasn't long enough or maybe not always fresh enough. Anyway, I find the stop bath effective and quick.But the point of a stop bath is that it arests the image instantly. Water does not.
Yes I agree but isn't that just restating what I already acknowledged about acid stop bath. My question which I was hoping could be answered remains as before, namely how much real difference to the negative over the average development time does it make and is this likely to be enough to make a difference that matters?But the point of a stop bath is that it arests the image instantly. Water does not.
I agree that if your development time is sufficiently long, the additional density built during a “water stop” is relatively minor.
It is the same with any procedure that has ramifications with respect to the short term results (in this case, the particular roll of film) and the long term workflow (in this case, fixer efficiency and capacity).I do wonder at times how this subject generates as much "wasted heat" as it seems to. It certainly is a Photrio "trigger point"
I do that occasionally in the Expert Drums. Especially if I have forgotten to measure out the fixer, or I need to quickly get its temp back up. Toss some water in there after the acid stop and let it turn until I have my shit together.I...
So there is the final answer - stop bath AND water rinse is best.
...
I would argue “possible/potential” long term benefits, assuming the “water stop” is done badly. As an acid stop user, I would need to concede use of an acid stop is just faster and probably less wasteful of water versus replacing the acid stop with a thorough water wash (I prefer the term “wash” versus stop or rinse since that is really what it should be thought of as, and how it should be done). It could even be soundly argued if one is interested in maximum fixer longevity/efficiency/capacity ideally a typical acid stop bath should be washed out before fixing.
So there is the final answer - stop bath AND water rinse is best.
Edit: typos
......
So there is the final answer - stop bath AND water rinse is best.
.....
Who said stop bath is useless? I use it all the time. You have a strange habit of not actually reading anything people write prior to responding. Either that or you have a serious reading comprehension problem. Or perhaps English isn’t your first language.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?