Stand development - first attempt - blank film

Flannigan's Pass

A
Flannigan's Pass

  • 0
  • 1
  • 9
Out Houses

D
Out Houses

  • 3
  • 0
  • 15
Simply leaves

H
Simply leaves

  • 2
  • 1
  • 30

Forum statistics

Threads
198,981
Messages
2,784,047
Members
99,761
Latest member
Hooper
Recent bookmarks
0

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,979
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Yes it would certainly seem unlikely that Adox would state as a minimum amount of 5ml as a quantity that gives development problems.
The edge markings are put there by the manufacturer, if you have no edge markings, then you have either put the fix in first, or developed the film in some kind of bleach.
To be fair to the OP, jarvman, he did then try his R09 with a leader for an hour and it made no difference. Somehow the R09 was totally shot

He did also describe his agitation and it did appear to me to be more like semi-stand. It certainly wasn't the stand development of the pour and leave alone variety

pentaxuser
 

Lachlan Young

Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
4,945
Location
Glasgow
Format
Multi Format
A quote from Roger Hicks: "As one of Ilford's technical experts said to me many years ago, "You need about a tablespoon of developer to develop a film. The rest is there to wet the film quickly and evenly." He also pointed out that a peel-apart Polaroid uses about a teaspoon full of developer."

This statement was made during a discussion about Roger successfully using D-76 1+3 (75ml/300ml).

This is largely correct, but there is a caveat that can/ will trip up the unwary - the minimum stock solution per roll is given more to ensure that an end user's results have a chance of being within a reasonable margin of operator error of the manufacturer's published data, even if the developer (given sufficient time compensation) will give equal results when used in a much smaller quantity per roll.
 

Lachlan Young

Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
4,945
Location
Glasgow
Format
Multi Format
Ah really. Never knew that. Thought it was the other way around. That’s good news because tri x is more expensive I think.

It's not a universal rule - it can and does vary between different developers, and the speed enhancing ones tend to narrow what little gap there is between them. HP5+ has some advantages, 400TX has others - neither is outright 'better' than the other.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom