(solved) Am i underdeveloping my B&W film?

Near my home (2)

D
Near my home (2)

  • 2
  • 3
  • 86
Not Texas

H
Not Texas

  • 9
  • 2
  • 98
Floating

D
Floating

  • 5
  • 0
  • 44

Forum statistics

Threads
198,537
Messages
2,776,832
Members
99,639
Latest member
LucyPal
Recent bookmarks
0

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,833
Format
Hybrid
There are a few films - Kodak T-Max films being three examples - where the "2x clearing time" rule of thumb would be better if it was a "3x clearing time" rule of thumb. They simply need more fixing.
As far as I am aware, you need to fix for significantly longer than 3x the clearing time before any bleaching effect starts to matter.
The only problem with using 3x the clearing time for all your film, is that it tends to delay your results longer than is necessary for lots of different types of films.

Yeah ... I was gonna mention that, but processing so-called normal film is complicated enough, and it didn't seem that the OP was using TMX/TMY &c so I thought I'd mention the extra fix needed times when he posted the typical "my TMX/TMY film is is magneta" thread when/if he crossed that bridge into the "exceptions to the rules" territory :smile: I agree with delaying one's results ! I barely have the patience to wait 1/2way though the typical 2x clearing time, 3x the clearing time would be like pure-torture...
 

Randy Stewart

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2006
Messages
278
Format
Medium Format
I was not aware of that site. Thanks!

I dilute at 1+9. So given the recommendations at 20 degrees, I should develop for even less than my 9 min. That does not feel right.

This is a classic of stupidity. Whatever the Massive Dev Chart says, Ilford says for this dillution and temp to develop for 4:15 minutes, not 9 minites, which is why the photos are grossly over developed. Why do people who need this type of information go to an on-line source full of BS and unverified data collected from who knows who, when they can as easily go the manufacturer and pull the needed data off their website? Oh, I know. Ilford is the establishment, and they want to mislead you so you'll get bad results AND HATE THEIR PRODUCTS!
 

Pieter12

Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2017
Messages
7,579
Location
Magrathean's computer
Format
Super8
This is a classic of stupidity. Whatever the Massive Dev Chart says, Ilford says for this dillution and temp to develop for 4:15 minutes, not 9 minites, which is why the photos are grossly over developed. Why do people who need this type of information go to an on-line source full of BS and unverified data collected from who knows who, when they can as easily go the manufacturer and pull the needed data off their website? Oh, I know. Ilford is the establishment, and they want to mislead you so you'll get bad results AND HATE THEIR PRODUCTS!
The Massive Development chart does not give those values...it has pretty much the same info as Ilford. The OP came up with 9 minutes from somewhere else!
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom