DREW WILEY
Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2011
- Messages
- 13,688
- Format
- 8x10 Format
Pieter - BW complained that "Holland Canal" was his "Moonrise" and that he was sick of printing it. Still, the cumulative quantity was never enough to warrant official numbering. Now you can buy very high quality press reproductions of that image, much better done than inkjet would allow, and clearly sold as reproductions. Brett would have been appalled at the idea of anyone else printing his work, and was on record about it. I sure wouldn't want anyone else printing my negs.
Likewise, AA own "Moonrise" was never editioned, though he did keep track of the total quantity - something like 350, which varied somewhat depending on when they were printed, as well as by size. Misc prints made from his negatives by assistants for sake of volume sales in Best Studios in Yosemite were signed differently. Those once sold for forty dollars in sets of ten (8X10 size) - that's only $4 per print. Now those same prints are still a relative bargain, at least compared to the ones he printed himself.
Carleton Watkins made a lot of his income from mass-produced little stereopticon views of Western scenery. We had a big stack of them in our own attic, and as a child I'd view em using an original 19th red velvet lined viewer. These stereo slides, or analogous mass-produced little prints from his negs, have very little collector value even today. But his personal mammoth plate contact prints in albumen - a medium he was a master of - were very expensive in his own time, and remain so. Few even remain. Most of his collection was destroyed in the 1906 SF earthquake. Now there's a fellow who did Yosemite imagery not only a lot earlier than AA, but better, at least in his personal prints.
But very few people are going to have a particular image catch on as much as these mentioned examples. Yeah, there is a cheesy underbelly to the "art" market as well, but no sense going there. I'd presume most people on a forum like this aren't snake oil sales types, but approach their own work more sincerely, regardless of level of skill.
Likewise, AA own "Moonrise" was never editioned, though he did keep track of the total quantity - something like 350, which varied somewhat depending on when they were printed, as well as by size. Misc prints made from his negatives by assistants for sake of volume sales in Best Studios in Yosemite were signed differently. Those once sold for forty dollars in sets of ten (8X10 size) - that's only $4 per print. Now those same prints are still a relative bargain, at least compared to the ones he printed himself.
Carleton Watkins made a lot of his income from mass-produced little stereopticon views of Western scenery. We had a big stack of them in our own attic, and as a child I'd view em using an original 19th red velvet lined viewer. These stereo slides, or analogous mass-produced little prints from his negs, have very little collector value even today. But his personal mammoth plate contact prints in albumen - a medium he was a master of - were very expensive in his own time, and remain so. Few even remain. Most of his collection was destroyed in the 1906 SF earthquake. Now there's a fellow who did Yosemite imagery not only a lot earlier than AA, but better, at least in his personal prints.
But very few people are going to have a particular image catch on as much as these mentioned examples. Yeah, there is a cheesy underbelly to the "art" market as well, but no sense going there. I'd presume most people on a forum like this aren't snake oil sales types, but approach their own work more sincerely, regardless of level of skill.