Scratched lens: Usable/salvageable?

Finders Kiptar

D
Finders Kiptar

  • 0
  • 0
  • 17
Dry Rack.jpg

A
Dry Rack.jpg

  • 2
  • 0
  • 41
Merriam Crater

A
Merriam Crater

  • 3
  • 0
  • 36
Merriam Crater

A
Merriam Crater

  • 3
  • 0
  • 32

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,491
Messages
2,775,986
Members
99,629
Latest member
zakarema
Recent bookmarks
8

snusmumriken

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Messages
2,446
Location
Salisbury, UK
Format
35mm
If I was buying, I would want to buy a minty one. But FWIW, I did have a manual focus Nikkor 105mm which got chucked across a small boat in a rough sea and ended up with similar scratches because the UV filter smashed. I never used UV filters again, but I did keep using the lens, and never noticed any degradation in performance. I know this will offend some people, but truthfully it was the only Nikkor lens I was sorry to part with.
 

Helge

Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2018
Messages
3,938
Location
Denmark
Format
Medium Format
If I was buying, I would want to buy a minty one. But FWIW, I did have a manual focus Nikkor 105mm which got chucked across a small boat in a rough sea and ended up with similar scratches because the UV filter smashed. I never used UV filters again, but I did keep using the lens, and never noticed any degradation in performance. I know this will offend some people, but truthfully it was the only Nikkor lens I was sorry to part with.

That sounds like an incredibly unlikely event. Once in red-blue moon.
Filters have saved 99.9% more front elements than they have damaged.
At sea having to wipe sea water splash off all the time, would be enough reason in itself to use a filter.
A blow that smashes the filter into the front element, would also have damaged the naked element.
The takeaway lessen here should be: When on a boat, hold on to your lenses or have them in a bag at all times.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,316
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
If I was buying, I would want to buy a minty one. But FWIW, I did have a manual focus Nikkor 105mm which got chucked across a small boat in a rough sea and ended up with similar scratches because the UV filter smashed. I never used UV filters again, but I did keep using the lens, and never noticed any degradation in performance. I know this will offend some people, but truthfully it was the only Nikkor lens I was sorry to part with.

Sounds apocryphal.
 

gone

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,505
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
I've seen worse, and at least it doesn't have large gouges taken out of it. I've had lenses like the one shown in the pic, and other than losing some contrast and needing a hood (you wouldn't want to shoot it into the sun), no problems really. Buy it for a good price, and put the savings into film/paper/chemicals.
 

AnselMortensen

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2020
Messages
2,428
Location
SFBayArea
Format
Traditional
Don't pay much.
Use a proper lens hood, & don't let any light hit the front element directly.
Don't shoot into the sun.
Expect a loss of contrast.
Portrait subjects will like the results.
Bob's your uncle.
 

Huss

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
9,058
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA
Format
Multi Format
That sounds like an incredibly unlikely event. Once in red-blue moon.
Filters have saved 99.9% more front elements than they have damaged.
At sea having to wipe sea water splash off all the time, would be enough reason in itself to use a filter.
A blow that smashes the filter into the front element, would also have damaged the naked element.
The takeaway lessen here should be: When on a boat, hold on to your lenses or have them in a bag at all times.

I bought a Nikon 35-70 manual focus lens for $1 at a flea market because the uv filter on it was smashed. The seller thought it was an integral part of the lens. When I got it home and removed the filter, the glass underneath was perfect.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,673
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
$20.00 seems like a small price to pay if your intention is to experiment with a lens with characteristics that you don't have in other lenses. Say if you don't have a lens in that focal length.
$20.00 is a gamble if you are in a need of a lens that gives you high quality results in a range of circumstances.
$20.00 is a deal if you are looking for a lens that adds flare and a bit of reduced contrast in portrait conditions.
 

xkaes

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 25, 2006
Messages
4,707
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format
We still don't know a damn thing about the lens, so everything thing that has been written is meaningless.
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,630
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
That scuffing makes this lens useless.

1668450128326.png
 

Frank53

Member
Joined
May 18, 2013
Messages
660
Location
Reuver, Netherlands
Format
Multi Format
Guess we’ve all seen this one before?
 

xkaes

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 25, 2006
Messages
4,707
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format
Guess we’ve all seen this one before?

As this kinda sorta never mentions, much depends on the f-stop and the focal length. A long lens wide open would show minor problems even with a big scratch, while a wide-angle lens stopped way down would be nasty even with small scratches.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom