I work with both enviourments, like many here I am not linked to one way being better than the other, and I never trust second hand information or do I trust manufacturers claims...
RA4 prints are beautiful whether made by a skilled enlarger operator or skilled digital operator. I got burned in my first 15 years of colour printing as this product does fade and I have seen it in my life span of printing for others. Epson and Canon both seem to be making huge timeline claims on their product line, if you believe them I have a bridge I want to sell you. ( I am making hand made pigment prints now as I do not believe the hype of inkjet lasting 300 years, reminds me of Cibas 200 year guarantee(anyone remember that) and if so if I can find the responsible party I have a bone to pick with those marketing boneheads.
I switched from RA4 to inkjet for three reasons.... One the wet chemicals really stink and need lots of volume to keep the lines going, and today the Inkjet papers have a broader Palette of colours possible and more selection of papers. ( I just saw Ed Burtynskys show and he has switched to inkjet for the bigger prints he is showing.) This is significant as he owns both RA4 and inkjet like I did.
I did a test (seems like 10 years now) where I took 8 x10 BW negative and made an enlarger print on Ilford MG4, then I scanned the negative and made a Lambda Fibre , and a Inkjet on Bayrta paper. To be fair I had a competing printer in Toronto make the first print from the enlarger setup and then I matched with the scanned versions... These prints were at 30 x40 inch size and over a period of 1 year I showed the prints to different larger groups, Springfield Mass, and other east coast groups as well as groups in Toronto, I only asked one question and it was can anyone tell me which print was which... Sounds easy you say well no , over 300 people replied everyone had a different viewpoint and there was only one person out of 300 actually told me exactly which was which and that was Les McLean. the tip off was the enlarger print was soft in one corner... Other than Les people could only guess and most were not correct.
This was a very valuable lesson for me , and it is the reason I keep making inkjet , silver prints... People have their needs and we can satisfy them with multiple options.
A competent enlarger operator has their sets of skills , that many here can relate too. . But a competent digital PS expert has the same but different skill sets but IMHO both are equally talented. I am kind of not answering the OP's question but
reacting to ( are Digital Prints better than Enlarger Prints) the simple answer , they are both good and both have their merits.