The older RB lenses are said to be not as sharp but the latest RB lenses are said to be as sharp as the RZ lenses. I don't know of any advantage to using the RB lenses on an RZ unless you all ready own some or there is a particular focal length that you want to use that isn't represented in the RZ lineup.
There are three series of RB lenses:
1. The "non-C", early RB lenses. They only say "Mamiya-sekor"
2. The "C" lenses, distinguished by the green "C" marking. They are multicoated and the optical design was revised on some of the lenses, for example in case of the 90mm and (i think) 65mm lenses. I have a post somewhere on APUG or on photo dot net where i point out the exact differences.
3. The "K/L" lenses which were introduced with the pro-SD. They are significantly more advanced in technology, sometimes faster, and probably have the same optical design to some of the RZ lenses. "K" means compatibility with the RB pro-S and plain RB bodies.
As for sharpness, i own the lenses of the (2) series, and i found them perfectly sharp in general. So i wouldn't worry.
Thanks for the information!
It's the early non C lenses that I heard about that were used on the first RB's that were not as sharp. Of course as I said, this is what I heard. I have no practical experience with these lenses.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |