Paul Verizzo
Member
I think people should have to pass an examination in order to be able to purchase and use a camera.
The exam board could consist of the most anally retentive and reactionary members of APUG, which should ensure that no one would go around the place taking any pictures at anything other at box speed, developing them in D76 (or at least using anything other than box speed only after two years of intensive grey-card photography) and then printing them in a darkroom on Azo paper. Or have a beard that isn't bushy or wear a hat that isn't a Stetson, or own any form of mobile telephony device. Or be younger than at least the average age of the exam board.
That'd show the little fuckers what rules are for ...
So, one time I took a two night class on "Selling your photographs." The teacher was truly accomplished in that, made a living doing both free lance and assignment work of travel and nature photographs. Believe it or not, there were several individuals in the class who obviously weren't even "doing" photography yet, just dreaming of an end result! One woman asked, "What kind of camera should I get?"
Before the teacher could respond, I blurted, "An Argus C3 and a roll of Tri-X." Stunned silence as he tried to process that. I don't remember what he eventually said.
The second night I brought in a book by Helmut Newton, one of my favorites. He looked through it at said, "I don't get it." That was a major "Ah ha!" moment for me, understanding a difference that is not often seen.
That teacher was a master at what I now call "Pretty pictures." Which is what most of the public confuses as art. You know flowers, sunsets, puppies. If a response to a photograph is "Ah................", it sucks.
Which is why there was a market for his work.