I think people should have to pass an examination in order to be able to purchase and use a camera.
The exam board could consist of the most anally retentive and reactionary members of APUG, which should ensure that no one would go around the place taking any pictures at anything other at box speed, developing them in D76 (or at least using anything other than box speed only after two years of intensive grey-card photography) and then printing them in a darkroom on Azo paper. Or have a beard that isn't bushy or wear a hat that isn't a Stetson, or own any form of mobile telephony device. Or be younger than at least the average age of the exam board.
That'd show the little fuckers what rules are for ...
engineers and scientists make rules; artists break them(and get better images)
artist and an engineer.
186,000 miles per second. It's not just a good idea. It's the law!
Leonardo da Vinci.
Let me hear that somebody says that he was not artist and an engineer.
I think you were pretty clear. But then some guy started with the old decisive moment Adams sucks pretty pictures vs art nonsense. What a diaper full. Reminded me of those heady days with the guy who was learning from Amedon's printer.
Anyway, back to the rules and arguments, I have a problem with the way in which PE characterized the faster-than-light stuff.
Just make sure you use your turn signal when moving, please.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?