Which is "right"?
Both. K is a manufacturer-selected constant that is chosen to maximize photographic success, in their individual experience. Same with C. The difference is negligible in practical terms.
Which is "right"?
Which is "right"?
This one may be the Trabant of meters:
![]()
TTArtisan Light Meter II review : "If budget matters most, this is a serviceable light meter for film cameras"
The TTArtisan Light Meter II might not be perfect, but it’s still one of the cheapest and easiest-to-use reflected-light-measuring devices on the marketwww.digitalcameraworld.com
I couldn't find the information on the Gossen. Also Gossen on some of their meters have direct readout of the luminance cd/m^2 and doesn't show how to convert between EV @ ISO 100 to Cd/m^2. For a K14 meter EV0@ISO100 is 0.14 Cd/m^2 and for K12.5 then it's 0.125 Cd/m^2. I know Minolta and Pentax use K14 and Sekonic uses K12.5.
Thanks for looking. FWIW, MY GOSSENS (4) ALL READ THE SAME AND agree with the SeonicL858D within 0.1 f/stops. I, therefore, assume Gossen lightmeters are also calibrated to a K value of 12.5 and that Gossen goes by the assumption that an average scene reflects about 18% of the light falling on it (known as middle gray).
I would suggest the Rolls Royce of light meters is the Western Master II
Before I sold the Pentax spotmeter I tested it against the new Sekonic 758DR by comparing reading from different objects in the room. Now and then I may have noticed a very slight difference which I attributed to not having one pointed from the exact same location as the other. But any difference was insignificant and otherwise each agreed with the other. Previously I compared the reading from the Pentax digital spotmeter with the Pentax 67II meter by comparing spot readings and average readings - taking several spot readings of a scene and averaging them. Both gave the same results.
Besides the batteries, the new 858 is able to read lower light thresholds which is useful in night photography.
Typically it is, but I'm not sure if there is a uniform standard applied to these measurements. Still what the L858D costs, it's hard not to see it as feature pile on to get the price high enough to improve net profit. I personally never liked the overall shape of these meters and what I got in the Kenko 2200 for half the price is beyond imaginative needs. Then again, if I ran a pro studio my take on this might be somewhat different.
On another note there were some reports of touch screen misbehaving at some point of their life. Hopefully this is not common.
... they also make impressive spectrometers like the Sekonic C-800-U. Just saying ;-)
Modern cars look so much better than the old clunkers from the 1970s.
'70's Mercedes looked like clunkers?
The Reveni Labs Lumo will also read T 0.5 and T 0.1 flash duration, as well as light flicker for other sources. Flash duration reading limits are on the web page. Small business based in Canada. Reads color temp, etc. I've had one for a few weeks and impressed. Has a replaceable battery and charges over USBC. Not for everyone, but I like it a lot. Also very reasonably priced.
Lumo Meter — Reveni Labs
www.reveni-labs.com

I nominate Ralph as Lighting Nerd of 2025 and 2026![]()
I am surprised that Gossen doesn't make the high end meters any more like the Starlite. Kenko also stops making meters based on the Minolta meters. So there isn't much choice for meters today.
My two ton board

@Bill Burk ,
Are you, by chance, in possession of an extra "e" that isn't where you thought you put it? If so, I think you meant to place it at the end of the "ton" above![]()

It's worth the money? At the moment I have an older Lunasix with the a proper mercury battery an it seems to give good results, but I know someday the battery will die and it won't work as well.Fortunately, there is a new kid on the block now.Revini Labs from Canada recently released the 'Lumo'; an incident and flash meter also capable of performing FDA. I got myself one and it is great!
It's worth the money? At the moment I have an older Lunasix with the a proper mercury battery an it seems to give good results, but I know someday the battery will die and it won't work as well.
The Lumo is a worthy replacement?
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |
