Eh I can do that with my Lubitel 2.
Hasselblads were simple and reliable
That said, my dad's favorite cameras to use were slxes. Apparently a good chunk of my childhood photos were shot on one. I still have two or three 80 planars. Wish chargers, batteries and bodies were more common, can't find one in a price range I'm willing to spend
That is not an SLR. Go sit in the corner for a while.
Bronica S2 is focal plane shutter camera; no leaf shutter lenses produced for this that I am aware of.
... many AD's looked for the Blad notches on the contact sheets / light table and if you were using a non-Blad camera they would whine your images weren't sharp enough. This without really looking at them critically. ...
Art directors looking at equipment rather than the image. How ironic.
105mm f/3.5 Nikkor with leaf shutter was produced for this series, but they are on the pricey side.Bronica S2 is focal plane shutter camera; no leaf shutter lenses produced for this that I am aware of.
There were a few.Oh well, howabout the Mamiya M645?
I believe the Hassy was more popular with professionals because of the between the lens shutter provided faster sync speeds. I have, or have hadboth, and the HAssy doesn't hold a candle to the Rollei as far as versatility. WishI could afford to buy my SL 66 back.
There were a few.
They are/were somewhat complex to get used to, because you have to set a fairly low shutter speed on the focal plane shutter. You also need to manually cock the lens shutter each time, unless you have the particular combination of later model camera, motor winder and connectors that would do it for you.
They do however work fine in "normal" mode, so if you don't mind some minor downsides (like a bit more weight, different filter sizes and, in at least one case, slightly smaller maximum apertures) they can be used in place of the non leaf shutter versions.
For a while I had and liked the old 70mm f/2.8 version. I essentially replaced it with the 80mm f/4 macro lens, because I have other cameras with leaf shutters.
Oh well, howabout the Mamiya M645?
Before I had my bad experience with the sales person (detailed above) I was using a Bronica S2a with various Nikkor lenses. In many respects I actually liked it better than the Blad I ended up with. The only downside for me was the backs didn't stand up to heavy use. I'm talking over 30-40 rolls a day. The gears inside the backs were not made for that kind of punishment. The other downside was many AD's looked for the Blad notches on the contact sheets / light table and if you were using a non-Blad camera they would whine your images weren't sharp enough. This without really looking at them critically. Once I got on to that little bit of stupidity I carefully filed some notches into my Bronica backs. I also filed notches on the opposite side in order to identify a particular back if I had problems with it not spacing properly. Ah the good old days ......
I just picked up an slx, and need to get a charger for it. I love the faster handling, compared to a hasselblad. Wish they were more common, and wish batteries were easier to come by
I just picked up an slx, and need to get a charger for it. I love the faster handling, compared to a hasselblad. Wish they were more common, and wish batteries were easier to come by
Maha made a charger for it better than the lame Rollei charger. I think the model number was 777, although they might be Powerex now.
If you have a NiCad battery, replace the cells with NiMH. Makes a huge difference and doesn't cost much if you do it yourself.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?