Roll Film Failure!

Signs & fragments

A
Signs & fragments

  • 4
  • 0
  • 22
Summer corn, summer storm

D
Summer corn, summer storm

  • 1
  • 1
  • 29
Horizon, summer rain

D
Horizon, summer rain

  • 0
  • 0
  • 34
$12.66

A
$12.66

  • 6
  • 5
  • 183

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,815
Messages
2,781,244
Members
99,712
Latest member
asalazarphoto
Recent bookmarks
0

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,950
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Because light moves at the....um....speed of light. If I can see the edge of the film, then the damage is already done.

To those who made the same points as made by StoneNYC this seems like a logical reply or is there a flaw in i? I just don't know. I can't see any flaw in Rattymouse's reply but I remain open to counterarguments

Thanks

pentaxuser
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
4,924
Location
San Francisco
Format
Multi Format
As the roll is handled or moved about the edge of the paper backing moves and lets more light in where it may have not been before. Yes, initial damage done, more handling means potential more might be done. Best to get it processed ASAP or put it in light tight container before then.....

To those who made the same points as made by StoneNYC this seems like a logical reply or is there a flaw in i? I just don't know. I can't see any flaw in Rattymouse's reply but I remain open to counterarguments

Thanks

pentaxuser
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,364
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
The opaque black 120-sized canister units supplied by Glass Key Photo were LAVIALS Hinged-Lid Lab Grade Vials, Part No. VL20H. The current online price (April, 2011 price list) ranges from 16-cents/vial (qty: 1,000) to 11.3-cents/vial (qty: 50,000).

These vials are identical in appearance to the Freestyle Maco-branded canisters offered at $1.99 each.

Group purchase, anyone?? (I already have mine.)

Ken

Count me in for a dozen. [US dozen, not a UK dozen :wink:]
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,950
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
So provided that the roll has only been handled by the spool ends then no difference but as this is unlikely then it a fair point Richard, thanks

pentaxuser
 

GarageBoy

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2012
Messages
992
Format
35mm
Wait...shouldn't you be concerned with the PREVIOUS roll, since you swap spools and the new film is wound onto the old roll?
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
The face of the break is consistent with an "all at once" break. Defects in material are normally pretty easy to see along a fracture.

Exactly. I don't see a "failure" at the spool either.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Invest in a few rolls of Rollei CR200. Save the canisters they come in and re-use them for any other 120 film you need to put in a pocket...

rollei-cr200-120-5-pack-3529-p[ekm]300x300[ekm].jpg


RR


Maco offer this canister, and a twin version too, empty.
 

Nige

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2002
Messages
2,316
Format
Multi Format
In Aust, if you don't like M&Ms, Skittles also come in them :smile: I take them into camera club for those without a sweet tooth or kids...
 

GarageBoy

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2012
Messages
992
Format
35mm
No I shouldnt be.
I don't understand
120 film doesn't get rewound, it ends up on the empty spool that the previous spool of film left behind
So, shouldn't you be looking back at the roll you used in that GF670 before that roll of Velvia went int?
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom