To those who made the same points as made by StoneNYC this seems like a logical reply or is there a flaw in i? I just don't know. I can't see any flaw in Rattymouse's reply but I remain open to counterarguments
As the roll is handled or moved about the edge of the paper backing moves and lets more light in where it may have not been before. Yes, initial damage done, more handling means potential more might be done. Best to get it processed ASAP or put it in light tight container before then.....
To those who made the same points as made by StoneNYC this seems like a logical reply or is there a flaw in i? I just don't know. I can't see any flaw in Rattymouse's reply but I remain open to counterarguments
The opaque black 120-sized canister units supplied by Glass Key Photo were LAVIALS Hinged-Lid Lab Grade Vials, Part No. VL20H. The current online price (April, 2011 price list) ranges from 16-cents/vial (qty: 1,000) to 11.3-cents/vial (qty: 50,000).
These vials are identical in appearance to the Freestyle Maco-branded canisters offered at $1.99 each.
I don't understand
120 film doesn't get rewound, it ends up on the empty spool that the previous spool of film left behind
So, shouldn't you be looking back at the roll you used in that GF670 before that roll of Velvia went int?