Right-Angle Finder - Will It Enable Me To....

20250427_154237.jpg

D
20250427_154237.jpg

  • 2
  • 0
  • 61
Genbaku Dome

D
Genbaku Dome

  • 7
  • 2
  • 79
City Park Pond

H
City Park Pond

  • 0
  • 1
  • 70
Icy Slough.jpg

H
Icy Slough.jpg

  • 2
  • 0
  • 58
Roses

A
Roses

  • 8
  • 0
  • 141

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,508
Messages
2,760,094
Members
99,522
Latest member
Xinyang Liu
Recent bookmarks
0

DF

Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Messages
574
...get the best ground-level shot looking upward possible?
What I mean is this: I have this idea of of mounting my camera to the tripod center post -
but through the opposite end so It's as close to the ground as possible -
but of course I can't get THAT close down to see through the viewfinder, not unless something that would give me half-a-foot-or so of crouching space to help me peer into the image. Get It ? 'Want tp try this out at local camera store run out of stock.
Lastly, if this were possible, what would be the best for a Minolta X-700? There's this off brand on E-Bay called "Seagull" -
any good?
 

DWThomas

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 13, 2006
Messages
4,601
Location
SE Pennsylvania
Format
Multi Format
Might depend on how young and physically flexible you are. :angel: I used a right angle attachment on my Canon A-1 to photograph the eclipse in 2017. It was the "official" Canon item (older, manual, FD series stuff). I found that it was a bit lacking in eye relief and I had considerable trouble keeping my eye on the optical axis and not losing the image. Of course, a total solar eclipse is a bit of a special case. My biggest problem was an inability to see any edges of the frame which might have been nearly as bad viewing direct, but it made it difficult to center the eclipsing sun. That would be less of a problem with more normal subjects in daylight.

Your best bet is to try one some where before plunking money down. Although that said, I believe I paid the princely sum of about $25 for the Canon item. The early FD finder actually installed and worked on my EOS series camera too, although I believe they make a more exotic (and $$$) one in the EOS line.

Waist level finders would likely be handier, but I think there are not too many 35mm cameras that can use them. WLFs are relatively common with medium format.
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2007
Messages
288
Location
Kentucky
Format
Multi Format
I have an older Nikon brand one. It will only work with certain Nikon models-Fs with round eyepieces, Nikkormats with the same, F2s, the F3 non-HP, FE, FE2, FM2(n), and FM3a. There's probably an adapter to work with other Nikon models, but Nikon also makes virtually the same piece for rectangular eyepieces and the larger diameter high eyepoint screw-ins(F3HP to F5, D1 series, N8008, N90, F100). I'm not sure if they've made a round locking version for use on the F6(and D2 and newer series round eyepiece cameras).

The one I have is a lot like using a microscope eyepiece. There's next to no eye relief, although it's also somewhat magnified vs. viewing directly through the finder. I see it as somewhat of a limited use accessory-I could see myself using it with bellows and a macro focusing rail on a tripod, and it could POSSIBLY be useful on a copy stand(depending on exactly how you had the camera positioned). I don't find it useful for general photography.

For cameras with a removable finder, I'd rather use a waist level or a chimney finder. I love the Canon speed finders for the F-1 series cameras, which give you a big, bright image that you can see from a good distance away and position in several positions.
 

Deleted member 88956

Minolta finder newer

Minolta finder older

There are plenty of these and there are no better replacements. Minolta was a high quality stuff, all up until it died Sony's death. By the latter I mean people forget what Minolta did for Sony's current status in camera manufacturing.

And yes, it will give you much better approach to the finder above ground level, but still ... down there.
 

John51

Member
Joined
May 18, 2014
Messages
797
Format
35mm
The camera will be on the lower end of the tripod post looking upwards. Won't this mean that the rest of the tripod is in shot?

Assuming a flat surface, the easiest way to get a ground level facing upwards shot is to lay the camera on the ground and use the self timer or a long cable release. A bit of guesswork needed with the composition but you're not going to see the full frame with a right angle finder either.
 

Deleted member 88956

The camera will be on the lower end of the tripod post looking upwards. Won't this mean that the rest of the tripod is in shot?

Assuming a flat surface, the easiest way to get a ground level facing upwards shot is to lay the camera on the ground and use the self timer or a long cable release. A bit of guesswork needed with the composition but you're not going to see the full frame with a right angle finder either.
For most ground level shots tripod is still preferable and camera can, most of the time, be positioned so tripod itself does not get in the way, but with camera mounted it can be locked in an exact position as needed.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,990
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
I have this idea of of mounting my camera to the tripod center post -
but through the opposite end so It's as close to the ground as possible - but of course I can't get THAT close down to see through the viewfinder, not unless something that would give me half-a-foot-or so of crouching space to help me peer into the image.

There are better ways to gain extreme low perspective, but this is the easiest way:

Hang the camera upside-down on the tripod, mount the right-angle finder, facing upwards. As getting to its eyepiece is now blocked by the collumn and tzhe rear leg, you have to turn the finder a bit to the side, say by 45°.
 

Arklatexian

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2014
Messages
1,777
Location
Shreveport,
Format
Multi Format
...get the best ground-level shot looking upward possible?
What I mean is this: I have this idea of of mounting my camera to the tripod center post -
but through the opposite end so It's as close to the ground as possible -
but of course I can't get THAT close down to see through the viewfinder, not unless something that would give me half-a-foot-or so of crouching space to help me peer into the image. Get It ? 'Want tp try this out at local camera store run out of stock.
Lastly, if this were possible, what would be the best for a Minolta X-700? There's this off brand on E-Bay called "Seagull" -
any good?
Have you thought of taking a piece of plywood, drilling a 1/4" hole in the center and mounting your tripod "head" to the board with a 1/4,20 screw. Mount your camera on the tripod head and you would then have a "ground level tripod" for "ground level photographs" made with your right angle viewfinder.......I have a wheeled dolly for one of my tripods that has a screw in its center so I can do the same thing...........Regards!
 

jeffreyg

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 12, 2008
Messages
2,586
Location
florida
Format
Medium Format
I don't have it handy but check the Bogen/Manfrotto catalog. They have a number of clamps and attachments. You can probably find one that will connect to your tripod or rig something that will work along with a right angle finder from a comfortable position and can be used at other times as well.

http://www.jeffreyglasser.com/

http://www.sculpture and photography.com/
 

guangong

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
3,589
Format
Medium Format
Have you thought of taking a piece of plywood, drilling a 1/4" hole in the center and mounting your tripod "head" to the board with a 1/4,20 screw. Mount your camera on the tripod head and you would then have a "ground level tripod" for "ground level photographs" made with your right angle viewfinder.......I have a wheeled dolly for one of my tripods that has a screw in its center so I can do the same thing...........Regards!
Yes, that sounds like a good idea. Make something like what is known in cinematography as a high hat.
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
5,463
Location
.
Format
Digital
Lastly, if this were possible, what would be the best for a Minolta X-700? There's this off brand on E-Bay called "Seagull" -
any good?

I would avoid that stuff, one one important count being that it is not built to last.
Cheap, optically uncorrected accessories like this can not only impede the quality of the image you are viewing, but potentially damage your eyes through the need to constantly adjust your own eyes to the lack of optical precision. A few of these Chinese-made finders, among other touted 'must haves' are like looking through a thick glass bottle end. Surely Minolta has, at some time, made a right-angle finder suitable for their cameras? It is always best to get the manufacturer's own matched accessory even if the cost seems prohibitive.

Your anticipated set up is not uncommon (and might even be frowned upon in-shop), but with the camera upside down and the finder angled upward, you will face the dual challenges of adjusting the camera while assuming an awkward, unfamiliar (and very often, testing) viewing position; I did this many years ago and absolutely have avoided that ever since! Right-angle finders are commonly used for situations where the tripod is splayed out, but not right down to ground level; I use my own very often (Pentax 67 [pic] and Canon EOS) so I don't have to crouch down because it is a pain in the back (really!). The lowest I want is near waist level. Putting the camera on a stable resting object at ground level is much simpler an arrangement than using an inverted tripod centre-column.


P67_3G_RAFinder_on-loc.jpg
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom