Prolonged soak in demi. water for film

Happy Halloween

A
Happy Halloween

  • jhw
  • Oct 31, 2025
  • 4
  • 1
  • 47
Scent

D
Scent

  • 3
  • 0
  • 52
Inch strand, Ireland

A
Inch strand, Ireland

  • 10
  • 1
  • 80

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
200,392
Messages
2,807,449
Members
100,247
Latest member
Horbus
Recent bookmarks
0

Marco B

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
2,736
Location
The Netherla
Format
Multi Format
Hi all,

Just like others, I have at times struggled with drying marks on my film. While using wetting agent, and shortly dipping the film in demineralized water, still sometimes drying marks were left behind.

Now I have recently decided to leave out the wetting agent altogether and just do a last but prolonged soak of the developed film in demineralized water (10-15 minutes).

The films comes out very clean after drying, even when droplets were present when hanging them for drying. It seems to go better than before.

Are there any other people simply using a prolonged soak in demineralized water as the last bath for developed film? What are your experiences? Any possible cons to this approach?

Marco
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DanielStone

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
3,114
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Multi Format
personally, i just use EK photo-flo with distilled water for a minute or so before hanging up to dry. i dry at room temperature, no heater, and i try to hang the negs in a place where there is little dust. some hang their negs in the shower after running it with HOT water for a minute or so, the steam generated helps to keep the dust down.

-dan
 

c.w.

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
122
Format
Multi Format
What is demineralized water?

I use distilled water and photo-flo, and pour alcohol on top. The alcohol gets rid of any bubbles that might stick to the film, and i'd like to think it forms a layer that coats the film as i pull it out causing it to dry faster. Film seems to dry faster now than when i just used water and photo-flo, but i've never timed it.
 
  • Deleted member 2924
  • Deleted

Mike1234

Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Messages
1,908
Location
South Texas,
Format
4x5 Format
Adjust the amount of wetting agent to suit the "demineralised" water your using... relatively small differences in pH can affect surface tension. Also, as with any chemical, wetting agent can vary especially from manufacturer to manufacturer. When I was still processing my own film I generally needed to use a bit more than they recommended. I used Photo-Flo and commercially distilled water.
 

Mike1234

Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Messages
1,908
Location
South Texas,
Format
4x5 Format
^^^ Some providers claim reverse osmosis filtered water is "demineralized". They don't claim "all minerals removed" though most of the minerals are gone. At any rate even the best filtered water behaves a bit differently than distilled.
 

Wade D

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2006
Messages
897
Location
Jamul, CA
Format
Multi Format
A prolonged soak isn't necessary IMO. I use filtered well water with a few drops of dish washing detergent as a surfactant and have not experienced any drying marks.
A few passes through it are enough then hang to dry.
 

dancqu

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
3,649
Location
Willamette V
Format
Medium Format
Hi all, Just like others, I have at times struggled with drying
marks on my film. While using wetting agent, and shortly
dipping the film in demineralized water, still sometimes
drying marks were left behind. Marco

It may be your wash is not any too complete. The long
soak allows a complete diffusion outward of chemistry
left in and on the emulsion.

I use a protracted Ilford wash sequence and afterward
a short soak in half strength PhotoFlo; all with distilled
water. After hanging an eight blade film squeegee rids
the film of all surface water. Dan
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,750
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
^^^ Some providers claim reverse osmosis filtered water is "demineralized". They don't claim "all minerals removed" though most of the minerals are gone. At any rate even the best filtered water behaves a bit differently than distilled.

You are correct.

Richard Knoppow posted the following text on a different forum a few years back. I believe it gives a very good description of deionized, distilled and demineralized water, and their differences.

'The theoritical pH of pure water is about 7.0 but it is extremely hard to measure due to it poor buffering capacity. You just have to expose it to air and the pH will change!

Reverse Osmosis As the name implies, it is the reverse of osmosis. If you separate pure water and less pure water with a semipermeable membrane, the water from the pure water side will flow into the less pure water, just like water flowing downhill. If you apply pressure to the less pure water, water will flow in the reverse direction and that is how you get purer water by reverse osmosis. It is the least pure water of the three.

Distilled water By boiling water it forms steam which condenses into distilled water. It is still not very pure because some of the trace metals will be carried over with the steam. To get really pure water you redistilled the distilled water again to get double distilled water. In reality we need all glass utensils, reflux condensers, etc. It is a more complicated and expensive process than the name implies. Commercial distilled water is not very pure because it is just a steam distillate!

Deionised water It is common to put a reverse osmosis unit or a steam distilling unit in front of a mixed bed deionised unit. Basically tap water contains plentry of M+ and M-, the common ones are Ca2+, PO4--, Na+ and Cl- to name two, most of the problem in photographic process is caused by Ca2+. The purer the water the less M+ and M-. If one pass water through a mixed bed deioniser, the M+ and M- is captured by the resin and only water passed through.

Without going into too much details, generally speaking if properly done, deionised water is purer than distilled water which is much purer than water obtained by reverse osmosis. To put it bluntly unless one have a very 'hard water supply' it is unlikely that the water used with affect the photographic processes. One easy way out of problem with 'hard water' is to collect rainwater and use it instead.'
 
OP
OP
Marco B

Marco B

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
2,736
Location
The Netherla
Format
Multi Format
Hi all,

Thanks all for the suggestions and interesting info!

Marco
 

wogster

Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Messages
1,272
Location
Bruce Penins
Format
35mm
Without going into too much details, generally speaking if properly done, deionised water is purer than distilled water which is much purer than water obtained by reverse osmosis. To put it bluntly unless one have a very 'hard water supply' it is unlikely that the water used with affect the photographic processes. One easy way out of problem with 'hard water' is to collect rainwater and use it instead.'[/I]

Except rain water often includes air pollutants washed out of the air, so it needs some treatment as well, to remove said pollutants, it can also need some PH balancing as some rain is mildly acidic.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom