Process B&W differently if intended for scanning?

elrossio01.jpg

A
elrossio01.jpg

  • 3
  • 0
  • 33
sad roses

A
sad roses

  • 1
  • 0
  • 27
Water!

D
Water!

  • 5
  • 0
  • 47
Palouse 3.jpg

H
Palouse 3.jpg

  • 7
  • 2
  • 63
Marooned On A Bloom

A
Marooned On A Bloom

  • 4
  • 0
  • 53

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,436
Messages
2,774,940
Members
99,615
Latest member
Rsanz88669
Recent bookmarks
1

alanrockwood

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2006
Messages
2,184
Format
Multi Format
A lot of people recommend lower contrast for film you are going to scan. One thing about scanning is that you can really bring out detail in thin negatives that are scanned by playing with histograms and curves in softwared.

Now I am going to engage in a little speculation. Scanners tend to accentuate grain, though not in a particularly good way... the good grain vs. bad grain concept. Perhaps lower contrast negative end up being less grainy.

As far as capturing dynamic range is concerned, I am pretty sure that scanners have little or no problem with capturing the dynamic range available in a high contrast negative, but high contrast negatives have regions of high density, which means more grain (in the dense regions) than if the image were captured in a low contrast negative. This applies to conventional black and white negatives, not other types of films.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,360
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
I usually bracket +1 and -1 all my medium format shots. I've found that properly exposed BW and color negatives and chromes scan the best and are the easiest to post process.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom