If a photographer does Giclee (Inkjet) prints of his work in-house, as one of the various media that he produces, then the Giclee (Inkjet) media is just as valid an output for his/her art as any other type of print, because it is reflecting the photographers vision. I see nothing wrong with Giclee (Inkjet) as one form of image creation, when controlled by the photographer. After all, there are other forms of pigment prints that have been used for photography for many decades. (Bromoil, etc.)
Posters or ... Art????
-
- Thread starter bill schwab
- Start date
Recent Classifieds
-
For Sale Hasselblad 500ELX kit with CT80 lens
- Started by EgawaShiro
-
Free Kodak slide carousels
- Started by Mkaufman
-
Free Case of 22B Flashbulbs -- NE Ohio pickup
- Started by 2Dogs
-
For Sale Zone VI Development Timer and Newsletters
- Started by 2Dogs
-
Sold Nikon s2 with 50mm 1.4
- Started by Gram Nylén
Forum statistics
I cringe at the idea of releasing an image and only getting $20 for each reproduction. I would definitely want to know exactly what is not exactly a poster and not exaclty a photograph.
If you believe that selling images in this way will greatly increase your exposure to a greater audience and increase sales of your fine print work then persue it. But not with a signature for only a $20 cut.
If you believe that selling images in this way will greatly increase your exposure to a greater audience and increase sales of your fine print work then persue it. But not with a signature for only a $20 cut.
OP
OP
bill schwab
Advertiser
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:  |