Posters or ... Art????

[PHOTOTONE]

If a photographer does Giclee (Inkjet) prints of his work in-house, as one of the various media that he produces, then the Giclee (Inkjet) media is just as valid an output for his/her art as any other type of print, because it is reflecting the photographers vision. I see nothing wrong with Giclee (Inkjet) as one form of image creation, when controlled by the photographer. After all, there are other forms of pigment prints that have been used for photography for many decades. (Bromoil, etc.)

 

[Jim Chinn]

I cringe at the idea of releasing an image and only getting $20 for each reproduction. I would definitely want to know exactly what is not exactly a poster and not exaclty a photograph.

If you believe that selling images in this way will greatly increase your exposure to a greater audience and increase sales of your fine print work then persue it. But not with a signature for only a $20 cut.

 

[mark]

They are doing their best to screw you. Plain and simple.

JMVUO (just my very uneducated opinion) the devil is asking to buy your soul. Even a total know nothing about the business like myself can see that you would be on the losing end of this deal.

 

[bill schwab]

They are doing their best to screw you. Plain and simple.

Thanks again everyone... I couldn't agree more. I won't be going down that road.

Bill