Portable (???) Large Format Camera

about to extinct

D
about to extinct

  • 2
  • 0
  • 95
Fantasyland!

D
Fantasyland!

  • 9
  • 2
  • 132
perfect cirkel

D
perfect cirkel

  • 2
  • 1
  • 130

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,750
Messages
2,780,364
Members
99,697
Latest member
Fedia
Recent bookmarks
3

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,876
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
We have a couple of those battery free flashlights that work based on a crank powered generator - ideal for long term power failures.
Perhaps the daughter thought it employed that sort of technology!
 

Imaginaut

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2023
Messages
20
Location
California
Format
Hybrid
I've moved away from the crank recently in favor of solar - less motion blur, but unfortunately the low light performance suffers.

On a topic-related note, the Intrepid would be my top recommendation as well. For an affordable and lightweight camera, it's a good way to go.
 

Romanko

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2021
Messages
889
Location
Sydney, Australia
Format
Medium Format
All LF cameras I know of are portable (can be carried by one or two persons) as opposed to transportable (non-stationary, e.g. can be moved by truck) and self-propelled. That said, I vaguely remember a project where someone tried to convert a box truck into an extremely large format camera where the lens (the size of a beer keg) was mounted at the back and the photographic paper (the sensitive media) was mounted inside the truck. Processing was done in-place by applying the solutions with a painters roller (a broom, or a mop I don't remember the details).
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
22,715
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
All LF cameras I know of are portable (can be carried by one or two persons)

That still leaves a gamut ranging from a Wanderlust camera that you could strap to your wrist ranging up to a Sinar P2 which I would not recommend to strap to anything unless you want to tornado-proof it.
 

Imaginaut

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2023
Messages
20
Location
California
Format
Hybrid
“Portable” in its denotative sense might not be a useful conception when light weight and backpackability are primary considerations. When price is added to the equation the option range becomes even more limited.

IMG_0831.jpeg
 

Imaginaut

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2023
Messages
20
Location
California
Format
Hybrid
Isn’t the challenge finding the appropriate camera in the first place? Unless you’re referring to the photo I attached rather than the OP’s camera search.

The photographer in the photo is Bill Hao, who shoots wet plate on his portable ULF camera and develops the plates in his transportable darkroom bus. My idea of portable is a little different from his!

 

Romanko

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2021
Messages
889
Location
Sydney, Australia
Format
Medium Format
The photographer in the photo is Bill Hao
Thank you, I'll look him up. I had no doubts that the camera in the photo was purpose-built. The camera support system looks a bit redundant. Reducing the number of legs would make it more portable. There should be plenty of room in this bus for a mule or a camel to carry the camera around.
 

Imaginaut

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2023
Messages
20
Location
California
Format
Hybrid
That would indeed increase portability, but with a mule available I doubt reducing the number of legs would be a priority. Another approach might be to add more legs and find a way to get the camera to backpack itself, with the added advantage of not needing to use the darkroom bus sink as a feed trough! OP’s budget considerations would remain a limitation, but I will include some possible inspiration:

 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
13,928
Format
8x10 Format
There are all kinds of full-featured folding 4x5 field cameras that weigh less than 4 lbs. I recommend buying the best quality one you can afford - a solid keeper with tight fittings, and not something you'll regret buying later on. It might take some patience to find a good deal one if you can't handle typical asking prices, which are on the high side at the moment. But film isn't cheap either, so you don't want to gamble with an inferior camera where something might slip or vibrate.

For about 35 years I backpacked with a full Sinar 4x5 monorail system, and often an 8x10 camera for dayhikes at least. But now that I'm 75 I'm sure glad that I also invested in a lovely lightweight Ebony folder too. You won't find one of those affordably, but there are numerous other makes out there which should do well.
 
Last edited:

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,293
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
With modern materials like carbon fiber used for the camera structure, a monorail can be lighter than a 1940 Speed Graphic, competitive with a wooden field camera (some of which were astonishingly light) -- but carbon fiber structure isn't cheap. Probably the best combination of "light, inexpensive, and versatile (in terms of movements)" is one of those field cameras in "needs a little love" condition. By the time you're through fixing it up, you'll know all you need to know about operating it, you'll save a lot of money with "as is" listings, and those wood field cameras were about as light as anything with useful movements ever got for a given format.
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
13,928
Format
8x10 Format
In terms of the giant camera in the linked picture, his tri-tripod support system is simply three lightweight cheap aluminum survey tripods, upon which his camera might simply rest - possibly no linking attachment. Survey tripods have nice big platform tops.
 
Last edited:

Romanko

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2021
Messages
889
Location
Sydney, Australia
Format
Medium Format
Survey tripods have nice big platform tops.

I am actually considering modifying one to use with my Horseman 985. Probably an overkill but it is ten times cheaper than any decent photographic tripod. They are surprisingly light for their size.
 

abruzzi

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2018
Messages
3,056
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
Large Format
I bought a Toho monorail from @B.S.Kumar a while back. Its the earlier A model that clocks in at 1.1kg which is nearly as light as some of the lightest wood folders. Its almost entirely made of aluminum. They are not cheap, but they aren't that expensive either. There are two on eBay right now, one is the lighter model and one is the heavy (1.4kg) later X model. You really need to find ultra light lenses if you get one otherwise you lose much of the benefit. Right now I use a Fujinon CM-W 105/5.6 (220g) as the wide, a Schneider G-Claron 150/9 (230g) or a Fujinon-A 180/9 (170g!) for the normal, and a Kodak Ektar 203/7.7 (???g), Schneider Xenar 210/6.1 (375g), or Schneider G-Claron 240/9 (330g) as the long. All are light lenses.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,293
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
They are surprisingly light for their size.

I've had one of these for many years, and they're not as light as all that. Compared to an 8x10 or larger setup, perhaps, but the cheap carbon fiber unit I got a couple years ago from eBay is less than half the weight and cost (twenty years later) only twice what I paid with an employee discount for my Porter Cable surveying tripod (inflation adjusted, it was cheaper).
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom