I don’t have either (yet), and I generally don’t place too much credibility on reviews, BUT, I did look extensively at both of these and ruled out the Pacific Images devices, due to negative reviews and general lack of reviews. For example, the XAplus has only 5 reviews on Amazon US with an average score of 2.2 out of 5, and on B&H Photo only 3 reviews with same average. By contrast, the Plustek 8200ai has 260 reviews with an average of 4.2 out of 5, and B&H has 201 reviews with an average of 4.1 out of 5. The 8200i has a 4.1 out of 5 rating on Amazon out of 667 reviews.
If I were you, and had to take a chance on importing something, I would not want to go “out on a limb” with a product that has very low volume of sales and negative reviews ( the XAplus), and risk ending up with an “expensive boat anchor”

. I’d stick with something that has more and happier users (Plustek)!
I also don’t think that either vendor’s DPI claims should be looked at. I highly doubt that the Pacific Image can do anywhere near “10000dpi”…. Most of the Plustek feedback I got said the Plustek should be used at half the claimed DPI: 3600 instead of 7200. I think both are dealing with “empty magnification” at their peak rating…. Just creating extra unusable data to clog up hard drives, with no gain in real resolution.
Just my opinions!
By the way, looking at Reflekta here:
https://www.scandig.com/filmscanner/reflecta/index.html , they appear to be re-badged Paciific Images scanners ( or vice-versa?) . The pictures are identical!
Update: yes they are the same:
Pacific Image XA = Reflekta RPS 10M