Please measure your 11x14 Deardorff 'T' distance

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
186,839
Messages
2,602,337
Members
96,636
Latest member
TuteZaek
Recent bookmarks
0

Randy Moe

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2011
Messages
243
Location
Midwest USA
Format
Multi Format
As some may know I am setting up a Deardorff SC11 studio 11x14. I have just checked my 11x14 Deardorff OE and very old 11x14 back. 'T" on mine is 0.240"

I would like to know what other Deardorff's measure, both Field and Studio 11x14's as I may need to make major mods to get within ANSI 'T' of 0.332"

Some suggest custom holders, others suggest new GG frame and I suggest shimming.

Thanks for any info on 'T' measurements!
 

johnielvis

Member
Joined
May 21, 2010
Messages
967
Format
Medium Format
no way it's that much out of spec--you're measuring it wrong.

There are RAISED areas in the corners--you must measure from there--not in the middle of the gg frame.

just for giggles I measured mine with a 1/32 rule---corner: like 10.5/32 ----middle 8/32..this gives .328 corner (actual t distance) and .250 middle ("false" t distance).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
OP
Randy Moe

Randy Moe

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2011
Messages
243
Location
Midwest USA
Format
Multi Format
I know I measured correctly. I know about the raised corners. That is what it is, I have measured T on many film backs.

It's a variation from a long time ago.

Barry is not answering.

I have made arrangements to render it better.

1-DSCN3698.JPG 2-DSCN3699.JPG 3-DSCN3700.JPG 4-DSCN3701.JPG

no way it's that much out of spec--you're measuring it wrong.

There are RAISED areas in the corners--you must measure from there--not in the middle of the gg frame.

just for giggles I measured mine with a 1/32 rule---corner: like 10.5/32 ----middle 8/32..this gives .328 corner (actual t distance) and .250 middle ("false" t distance).
 

johnielvis

Member
Joined
May 21, 2010
Messages
967
Format
Medium Format
so it REALLY is that far out of spec? I don't see any excessive wear either--the one I have sure looks worn. Then again, my rule has some kind of offset if I'm measuring slightly larger than spec, right? Then again, I'm measuring to the GG and pushing kind of too--I'll get a proper measurement with caliper one of these days--I'll have to take out the glass to do it though....a job for later. I never knew that deardorff made different spec backs--particularly for commercial cameras--you'd think those cameras would be the ones to have rigid standards over any others. The nice thing about the raised portions is that they are easy to shim--even using a little sticky tape or spray glue on the shims.

If mine were worn to the measurement you're getting, the raised corners would have to be totally worn off.
 

Rick A

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
9,443
Location
Laurel Highlands
Format
Large Format
It very well may be that Deardorff used a different thickness GG on that model, hence the different backset.
 
OP
OP
Randy Moe

Randy Moe

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2011
Messages
243
Location
Midwest USA
Format
Multi Format
But, if the GG ground side is front facing as it should be, the viewing image is formed there not on different planes dependant upon glass thickness.

Meaning glass thickness means very little in focus.


It very well may be that Deardorff used a different thickness GG on that model, hence the different backset.
 

eclarke

Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Messages
1,950
Location
New Berlin,
Format
ULarge Format
Best way is to make a photograph and see if it looks good. If it does, don't overthink it.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
30,010
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
From the uninitiated: "What does T-distance mean?"
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom