Not sure I can take 72 photos in a couple of hours.
Pass it around to the others in attendance. You'll get through 72 pictures in no time -- and probably a few offers that will be hard to refuse!
Not sure I can take 72 photos in a couple of hours.
Let us hope some camera makers do start making fine cameras again. What we need are some good photographic "instruments" or "tools" available new again. The old ones are serving us well, but they will need to be replenished eventually. Every camera available new today, except the Leica rangefinder film cameras, encourage the young generations to view film as a joke instead of the true way to do photography.
Erwin Puts:
"Most people assume that digital photography (a huge misnomer) is simply photography by other means than the use of film and chemicals. ... This attitude is not only widespread it is the conventional wisdom worldwide. Being universally accepted does not make it true."
"The essence of film-based photography is not only the fact that the mechanism of capturing an image and fixing it in a silver halide grain structure creates a final picture that can hardly be altered. The fundamental issue here is the fact that the laws of physics create the image, in particular by the characteristics of light rays and the interaction between photons and silver halide grains. Photography is writing with light, and fixing the shadows."
"Photography is not only intimately linked to the use of film, but in fact depends for its very existence on film."
AI will be the savior of film. Walk into court with notarized slides, easier for a jury to accept film as evidence than trying to understand how encryption works.
You mean AI can't create a slide?
+1. That might become true. The whole Instagram crowd was started because the typical phone photos are technically too good to the point of boring, so you add noise, color distortion and fake film frames.
Now AI will make digital artwork even easier for everyone, so the new trend might be media (film, paper) that you physically manipulate. Just when streaming music becomes the norm, live performance seems to have a resurgence.
That's not the point. Goal of a trial is to convince a jury. It's easier to get your point across with something that is relatable.
'I point to these photographic slides, notarized by Mr. Smith, as genuine as seen at the scene photographic evidence.'
As opposed to
'These images on the screen are secure because of encryptions and have not been tampered with'
Film is more relatable than digital in some ways.
Jury trials are very American. In many other countries, e.g. in Europe, it is a professional judge (in some cases supported by a smaller jury, which usually cannot overrule the judge) which needs to be convinced. And general knowledge changes as well. In a few years, many adults might not have film experience anymore, but know digital images...
popular media will keep film at the fore front of public knowledge for a while to come.
As for juries, sure it's American. It's what I know, it's what I talk of. If film remains popular in America it'll keep on going in the rest of the world.
I'm afraid photographic evidence doesn't work that way.'I point to these photographic slides, notarized by Mr. Smith, as genuine as seen at the scene photographic evidence.'
Ask a teenager about a diskette, cassette, CD. They might have heard about it, but not much personal experience with them, at most. Vinyl is different, maybe better comparable with film: a niche for enthusiasts of different sorts, but still not mainstream.
I think film is as popular in Europe as in America, but again, not mainstream.
I'm afraid photographic evidence doesn't work that way.
At least not in the trial courts I appeared as legal counsel in.
Negatives or slides do have advantages though.
Ricoh has announced that they are stopping orders in Japan due to demand greatly exceeding supply: https://petapixel.com/2024/06/20/no-surprise-pentax-17-pre-orders-vastly-exceeded-expectations/
Perhaps this camera won’t be a flop after all.
I'm afraid photographic evidence doesn't work that way.
Ditto. I've been on lots of juries, and as a witness in trials, and never seen a slide, let alone a negative, presented. Not sayin' it doesn't happen!
Ricoh has announced that they are stopping orders in Japan due to demand greatly exceeding supply: https://petapixel.com/2024/06/20/no-surprise-pentax-17-pre-orders-vastly-exceeded-expectations/
Perhaps this camera won’t be a flop after all.
Have you had photographs submitted for evidence? What happens if either side disputes photograph or footage due to claims of manipulation or AI? What if it's an estate case, sans jury and Judge wants photographic evidence of an object or some other scenario?
There are other possibilities. Their expectation of the interest may have been unrealistically low, so they produced few -- to protest themselves from complete failure -- or they may have intentionally produced too few to suggest greater demand than there actually is -- hoping to drive up demand. It wouldn't be the first time in the history of "business" that this has happened.
More film vs digital. Shocking.
Good news, my preordered unit is shipped from B&H. That means they might have enough units for the first two waves. I did preorder pretty early, about few hours after the announcement.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |