• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Pentax announces that they're working on new film cameras!

Latest Gallery

spanish market

A
spanish market

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Paper Birch.jpg

H
Paper Birch.jpg

  • 0
  • 0
  • 19

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
203,059
Messages
2,849,273
Members
101,627
Latest member
GeorgeGGV
Recent bookmarks
1
I'm using a Pentax Su
dutchsteammachine said:
Well, one super 8 cartridge has room for approximately 3500 individual frames. There are a bunch of super 8 cams that have single frame mode.

So you could take 3500 photos with one cartridge.
Click to expand...

I love my inconvenient pointless small format photos and even for me this is a step too far.
 
dutchsteammachine said:
Well, one super 8 cartridge has room for approximately 3500 individual frames. There are a bunch of super 8 cams that have single frame mode.

So you could take 3500 photos with one cartridge.
Click to expand...

The frame size of Super8 is 5.8mm x 4.01mm, which is roughly a quarter the size of Minox. The quality leaves a lot to be desired, unless of course you like quality which leaves a lot to be desired for aesthetic reasons, in which case it is still quality which leaves a lot to be desired, but you get to wear a beret and jodphurs, and carry around a megaphone.
 
Last edited:
faberryman said:
The frame size of Super8 is 5.8mm x 4.01mm, which is roughly a quarter the size of Minox. The quality leaves a lot to be desired, unless of course you like quality which leaves a lot to be desired for aesthetic reasons, in which case it is still quality which leaves a lot to be desired, but you get to wear a beret and jodphurs, and carry around a megaphone.
Click to expand...

Minox is the smallest I'll go. At some point you need to be honest with yourself and understand that the mush your looking at isn't a very good photo due to the lack of quality.

Now, some would say that about 110, or even 35mm. We all have our cutoff points. I think it'd be more that I don't want to lug around a Super8 system to get such a tiny negative. And if you want anything near quality for still it'd be a beast of a super8 camera. Maybe even with a separate battery pack...but is it doable?

No. Nope. Not going to think about it. No no no. I'm not going to talk myself into this. No way jose.
 
Cholentpot said:
Sure. There's a whole group of us doing this. It's fun and a learning experience.
Click to expand...

Some of us have already had learning experiences with Minox and 110 many, many years ago. They were more interesting than fun. I prefer larger negatives to smaller ones, but it takes all kinds, so enjoy your journey.
 
faberryman said:
Some of us have already had learning experiences with Minox and 110 many, many years ago. They were more interesting than fun. I prefer larger negatives to smaller ones, but it takes all kinds, so enjoy your journey.
Click to expand...

Yes but how much can you squeeze out of that tiny negative? We're doing it voluntarily. Much like the rest of the analog film community. It's fun because there's a choice. In the bad old days no-one was reloading 110 carts with film not intended for it. With modern tech you can pull vast amounts of info out of the little 16mm strip that was never possible 30 years ago. It's pushing the format to its limits.
 
Cholentpot said:
Minox is the smallest I'll go. At some point you need to be honest with yourself and understand that the mush your looking at isn't a very good photo due to the lack of quality.

Now, some would say that about 110, or even 35mm. We all have our cutoff points. I think it'd be more that I don't want to lug around a Super8 system to get such a tiny negative. And if you want anything near quality for still it'd be a beast of a super8 camera. Maybe even with a separate battery pack...but is it doable?

No. Nope. Not going to think about it. No no no. I'm not going to talk myself into this. No way jose.
Click to expand...

But it gets better, read this:

I could get a C-mount to Canon FD/Nikon F adapter for my super 8 camera's and mount it to my Canon FD 400mm. Super 8 has a 6x crop factor compared to 35mm so that would result in a 2400mm equivalent.

Then you could also take ultra extreme telephoto footage, but I can't imagine keeping it steady...
 
dutchsteammachine said:
But it gets better, read this:

I could get a C-mount to Canon FD/Nikon F adapter for my super 8 camera's and mount it to my Canon FD 400mm. Super 8 has a 6x crop factor compared to 35mm so that would result in a 2400mm equivalent.

Then you could also take ultra extreme telephoto footage, but I can't imagine keeping it steady...
Click to expand...

I did something like this with an Auto 110. It didn't work out too well having stacked teleconverters.
 
On January 9, 2023 Ricoh Imaging announced the Ricoh GR III Diary Edition Special Limited Kit. The package features the Ricoh GR III in a metallic, warm-gray finish plus specially designed accessories: a case, a strap, a flash contact cover, and a matching ring around the lens. The camera... read at Pentax forum
 
waynecrider said:
On January 9, 2023 Ricoh Imaging announced the Ricoh GR III Diary Edition Special Limited Kit. The package features the Ricoh GR III in a metallic, warm-gray finish plus specially designed accessories: a case, a strap, a flash contact cover, and a matching ring around the lens. The camera... read at Pentax forum
Click to expand...

So $1150. I think they are going to need to offer a less expensive camera for a wider market. It appears they do have the capability to make a compact film camera, so that's encouraging.
 
dutchsteammachine said:
From the looks of it, most people are hoping for a camera in the 400-500 dollar range.
Click to expand...

That's the hope and logical price point.....because that's the upper end of what people are paying for excellent working examples of things like the Olympus Mju cameras. Presumably the proposed new Pentax P&S will not be a limited edition and the intention will be to manufacture it for several years....spreading the R&D and tooling up costs out over a length of time. That would have a positive impact on the price.
 
Roger Cole said:
Because I HAVE my phone all the time, including when I'm waiting somewhere with time to kill but my PC is back home.
Click to expand...

Ya, that's just me. I pretty much don't use my phone other than as a phone. Growing up as the youngest sibling in a household full of sisters I learned early-on how to kill time in public back when Dick Tracy still had the only 2-way wrist tv in the world.
 
I almost never use my phone as a phone. It''s really a very portable, always with me, almost always connected, tiny computer that just happens to have a voice app for making calls too, on the rare occasions I need that.
:wink:

I think "phone" is a misnomer for smart phones, really. They are much more computers than they are phones.
 
Roger Cole said:
...

I think "phone" is a misnomer for smart phones, really. They are much more computers than they are phones.
Click to expand...

It's a battery operated, pocket super computer with a color touch screen. It's really an amazing thing!
 
BradS said:
It's a battery operated, pocket super computer with a color touch screen. It's really an amazing thing!
Click to expand...

And it does things we never knew we needed to do, but now find our lives incomplete without doing them.
 
The smart phone is, indeed, rarely used as a phone. I have horrific anxiety around phone calls anyway so having several messenger apps suits me fine. My phone is indeed a pocket computer with functions I could not dare even imagine when I first used home computers some 42 years ago. I can control my entire home A/V system and heater/air con with it....I can take my own entertainment for a long haul flight, it's a decent-ish camera especially in pro mode. I can record memos, meetings and even concerts, make half decent videos....and share them within seconds or even stream live. I have full, unlimited access to the internet and www across the UK and continental Europe...But if I use it as a phone once a week, that's a lot for me.

I revived the spousal unit's Konica Z-Up 140 compact 35mmm P&S for our upcoming 25th anniversary party....going to have 35mm and 110 P&S cameras on tables so people can shoot film. As I have the cameras already, it works out cheaper than using single use cameras as we did for our 10th. It was this Pentax project that got me thinking about the idea.
 

0:34 view of 3D-printed prototype lens barrel
1:22 Exakta V is shown? I don't get it.
1:27 Unknown (to me) silver camera, maybe old prototype?


Sounds as if compact film camera is progressing! Much talk of wanting lever-wind mechanism, and the struggle of younger engineers have in understanding what was once a common feature.
8:26 "It's time for film!"
 
Last edited:
Good news all around. I’m very excited to see what they come up with and plan to support their efforts by buying it.
 
Dismantled SLR briefly shown is a P3/P30. Wonder if they chose to study that particular model because it's the last(?) lever-wind camera that they designed. Though not a pro-level camera, it's a good solid design once you replace an internal dampener which turns into sticky goo.

Mention is made of receiving words of support from manufacturers: Wonder if Copal is one of them.
 
Last edited:
The AP logo on his hoodie is a cute touch. Hard to say why they were showing the exacta, other than it was also an early SLR. I wonder if the chrome body was from the very short lived "K" series? (quickly repleced by the "M" series.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:
Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom