BULLSHEET.You obviously don't read what I have been writing here all day.
Did you make an exposure with each the new and old the lens wide open on the DSLR using the same target without moving the camera or target? Did the lens focus at the same distance on their scales?You say all the lenses focus accurately on the DSLR (which would imply both old and new lenses focus identically). However, when you focus with the DSLR, are you relying on the in-focus indicator (e.g. with a Nikon, there's the green LED) or are you focusing using only the groundglass and nothing else to determine the point of best focus?
Check the mirror position from the film plane/camera back with each the old and new versions of the lens attached.
There may be a flaw in one part of the testing method.
You say all the lenses focus accurately on the DSLR (which would imply both old and new lenses focus identically). However, when you focus with the DSLR, are you relying on the in-focus indicator (e.g. with a Nikon, there's the green LED) or are you focusing using only the groundglass and nothing else to determine the point of best focus?
... or just push on the pin actuation plate in the body (with the lens removed) and see if the mirror moves. I don't have a pentacon 6 handy, but if you do this with a Kiev 88, the mirror moves (because the pin actuation plate mechanism is part of the mirror mechanism). .
If it is a mirror issue, then the gradual difference in sharpness should be visible (unless there is some peculiar swing movement.)
Thus take a target with even spread focusing points, put it perpendicalir to the optical axis. If the pattern is evenly sharp with the "good" lenses, but has a gradual vertical difference with the "bad" ones, the cause of the problem is the mirror.
you can tape some tracing paper on the film plane and, with your camera mounted on a tripod, set the "b" shutter speed, press the release button and rotate the ring unterneath it to lock the shutter in open position. Now focus the lens on your target at the minimum distance with your old biometar (do it by means of a tape mesure being careful of measuring from the film plane to the focusing target and in a perpendicular direction to the film plane, do not use your ground glass to focus). You should be able to se a sharp image projected onto the tracing paper (you may need to use a magnifier to check it accuratelly) repeat this test with the newer biometar. If both lenses produce the same results the problem is in the ground glass that either came loose or moved.Sorry, but here I don't understand what you are suggesting. Do you mean looking at the 'projected image on the film plane'? That may make sense, but I have absolutely no idea how to do so, and even if I somehow managed to put something, on which the image could be projected where film is supposed to go, I would expect that projection to show exactly the same front-focus issue as the exposure on 'real' film.
you can tape some tracing paper on the film plane and, with your camera mounted on a tripod, set the "b" shutter speed, press the release button and rotate the ring unterneath it to lock the shutter in open position. Now focus the lens on your target at the minimum distance with your old biometar (do it by means of a tape mesure being careful of measuring from the film plane to the focusing target and in a perpendicular direction to the film plane, do not use your ground glass to focus). You should be able to se a sharp image projected onto the tracing paper (you may need to use a magnifier to check it accuratelly) repeat this test with the newer biometar. If both lenses produce the same results the problem is in the ground glass that either came loose or moved.
the problem you are experiencing is very weird. Perhaps you should look into buyng another pentacon body or get it checked by a professionalI honestly doubt that I will be able to mount a piece of tracing paper flat enough or that the image projected on the tracing paper is clear and detailed enough to evaluate focus. I could probably, as shutterfinger suggested, use an additional piece of groundglass, but since it has to be large enough to cover the shutter opening, I would either have to order a custom-made piece of glass or try to make one myself. Both options are either time or money consuming and I am not really convinced that they will bring me closer to a solution. I would also doubt, that the distance scale on the Biometars is accurate enough to make the test you are suggesting.
And, as pointed out several times: The focus works perfectly with any of my other lenses, so I can at least within any reasonable doubt, rule out that the groundglass in the Pentacon viewfinder is dislocated. If it had been loose or dislocated, I would not have been able to focus with the other lenses either.
If you focus to the target so that the image appears in focus on the ground glass, do you get a correct distance on the lense scale? Do you get the same value with the old biometar?
if that is the case, how many rolls did you shoot with the newer lenses? could it be possible that you miss-loaded the film or that the pressure plate came loose by chance every time you used the new lens?
The ground glass may need to be shimmed or may be loose.
You can argue all day long about focus but the proof of focus is what's projected on the film plane. It's either in focus or not and the way to test is a standard method. Your ground glass is not proof of focus. The rest can be dithered on forever. EIther you want to do the actual testing or you dont.If that is the problem, can you please explain why I don't have any focusing problems with any of the other lenses I own and use?
You can argue all day long about focus but the proof of focus is what's projected on the film plane.
I wish you good luck. Testing is a way of eliminating possibilities and narrowing down a diagnostic tree. You're satisfied that you don't need to perform a calibration procedure because you already know the outcome, so be it. I love the P6 it's a great camera.Where did I write anything else? When I use my old lenses, the image projected on the film plane is in focus, when it appears in focus on the groundglass in the viewfinder. Now once again: How can that be, if the groundglass is displaced or loose?
I wish you good luck. Testing is a way of eliminating possibilities and narrowing down a diagnostic tree. You're satisfied that you don't need to perform a calibration procedure because you already know the outcome, so be it. I love the P6 it's a great camera.
This problem seems to defy logic because:
(1) on the DSLR, all lenses,both old and new, when in-focus on the groundglass produce a focused result . This implies all of the lenses, old and new, have no focusing anomalies.
(2) on the P6, only the old lenses when focused on the groundglass produce an in-focus result. The new lenses produce a front-focus result. This contradicts the results of test (1).
I have a solution to the problem: buy a Hasselblad.
Ok, seriously... On the P6, is the groundglass plain or does it have a focusing aid such as split-image rangefinder, microprism, or fresnel pattern? If so, what I'm thinking is the angle of the light from the new Biometars is entering the focusing aid at a different angle (the cone of light is wider or narrower) than with the older lenses.
If it's just a plain groundglass, maybe this simple enhancement to your test would confirm uniform focus: rather than have a single ruler in the center showing distances, add two others at the sides (left and right). This may detect mirror or groundglass issues. Overall, though, I'm totally puzzled.
... Focus shift? What aperture were you using on the film shots?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?