• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Paper Developers?

Tom Kershaw said:
One advantage of DS-14 is consistency of performance; I experimented with the E-72 formula before switching over. DS-14 replenisher is simply the developer formula without Potassium bromide.
Click to expand...

Could you please show us the formula of the DS-14 you are using?
 
DS-14:
Start with 750ml water (I use distilled)
[/TR]
Dimezone S0.2g
ascorbic acid6.0g
sodium sulphite, anhy12.0g
sodium carbonate. mono30.0g
triethanolamine, 99%5.0ml
salicylic acid0.5g
potassium bromide1.0g
water to make 1000ml
note: I have been using Phenidone in place of the Dimezone S
ascorbic acid is food grade from eBay seller.
 
Thank you Tom.
 

Halcyon has the same set of sequestering agents but it's not a paper developer.
 
After monkeying around with paper developers for 30+ years I am of the opinion that the final print is about 98% due to the paper and 2% due to the developer. I've tried them all, Muir's maximum black developer, Amidol, adding old developer, you name it, I've tried it and the resulting print is almost indistinguishable from a print developed in D 72 or Bromophen or one of the other common developers. Having said that, choice of developers does seem to affect how a print tones, but not to a large degree. Instead of worrying about exotic developers I would concentrate of trying to master the skill of burning and dodging which has a much greater effect on your prints than the minuscule changes you might get by changing print developers. I well recall the advertising blurb from Fred Picker trying to sell his "wonder developer" he said that his developer avoided the tendency of Dektol to "dump high values" whatever that meant. It's a good thing that Saint Ansel didn't know about this fatal flaw of Dektol. Mind you, Picker would say anything to try and sell his products and silly me did buy his spotmeter.
 
Just got a bottle of Liquidol and so far, so good.
 
I'd like to try Ansco 130 for its legendary long life, but the equivalent Formulary 130 is no longer in Freestyle's website, and the Formulary itself says it's out of stock. Has anyone heard whether more will be produced?

Mark Overton
 
albada said:
I'd like to try Ansco 130 for its legendary long life, but the equivalent Formulary 130 is no longer in Freestyle's website, and the Formulary itself says it's out of stock. Has anyone heard whether more will be produced?

Mark Overton
Click to expand...

I would advise to either buy direct from the Formulary or buy the raw chemistry (not in kit form). Glycin has a rather short lifespan; I have had Formulary 130 kits sitting around for a couple of years and the packets of Glycin had all turned brown. It will still work, but it will stain the paper brownish, including the white borders of the print. I now buy the various ingredients separately and keep the Glycin in the freezer.

As far as I can tell, the Photographers' Formulary is the only place that produces Glycin in the USA.
 

MattKing said:
I have been looking to buy the powder version for nearly two years. It has been out of stock at all the online sources throughout that time. Even if it were in stock, B&H won't ship it.
Click to expand...

Both Freestyle and Adorama currently have powder Ethol LPD in stock and are willing to ship. Freestyle is much more expensive:

Ethol LPD Powder Paper Developer - 1 Gallon | Freestyle Photo & Imaging

Diluted 1:4 LPD will produce warm tones and 1:1 for cold tones with strong blacks; this developer will retain exceptional tonal range. Very large print capacity and long shelf life.
www.freestylephoto.biz

Ethol LPD 1 Gallon Powder Black / White Paper Developer

LPD Powder Black & White Paper Developer, 1 Gallon
www.adorama.com

Does anyone use LPD stock or 1+1 with Multigrade RC Deluxe? If so, please characterize the image color prior to any toning. I seek neutral blacks, but the only way to obtain anything approaching that with this paper has been selenium followed by gold toning, whether developed in Eco Pro or MCC developers. I've tried Moersch SE6 but, as with every other RC paper developed in it, areas of even tone exhibit a fine mottle, which I consider likely due to a high level of restrainer. Thanks in advance.
 
Darned brown Dektol. I may start buying cans
 

Sal, are you referring to the new Ilford MGRC paper? For me I find it needs about 2-3 min 1:19 to neutralize. The older MGIV RC I could hammer in selenium for 4 minutes 1:9 and it was a nice cool black. I’ve always used LPD but recently have been using multigrade developer at 1:9 dilution and also get nice neutral cool blacks after selenium.
 
brian steinberger said:
Sal, are you referring to the new Ilford MGRC paper?...
Click to expand...

Yes, I haven't succumbed to the Internet habit of referring to it as "V."


In the past I've tried any number of developers seeking a neutral image tone using other papers, only to find stubborn warmth with anything except Moersch SE6, and that one always causes a fine mottle on RC. Selenium shifts the tone with all of them, but never to neutral.

Ilford Multigrade developer has in my previous tests resulted in a yellow image tone on practically all papers, something that selenium could never eliminate, irrespective of dilution or time.

So far I've developed the latest Multigrade (RC Deluxe) in ADOX MCC Developer, Moersch SE6 and Eco Pro. The MCC and Eco Pro go as far toward neutral as they can (not close) before turning purple via Selenium 1+40 for three minutes at 74 degrees F. The expense and time/temperature touchiness of gold make going the rest of the way difficult and expensive. I'm reticent to repeat my effort obtaining many different developers and run the test again with Multigrade RC Deluxe.

If LPD + selenium can make a neutral image tone on this paper, I'd very much like to know, including whether you use the LPD stock or dilute it 1+1. Thanks in advance.
 
Sal, I’m sure I’m not as meticulous as analyzing tones of these prints as you. I just shoot for tones that look good in many different lighting situations. I mainly try to get rid of any “green” tones as that is unpleasant to me. If it pushes slightly toward purple that’s not great either. I prefer developers that will push it toward blue black if anything in selenium. The previous MGIV FB went blue black with LPD as did the RC version as well. It seems the newer generation papers MGRC, Classic and Cooltone all want to run towards purple. I’ve had to change my selenium dilution to 1:19 for less time and I feel now I’m not getting protection. I quit using LPD as the last two packs I got from freestyle both mixed up quite brown and never had that issue in the past. And now at $24 a bag it’s too expensive to take a chance. I’m planning to start mixing my own PQ developer, the ID-62 formula and start messing around with adding PMT and trying to get longer selenium times with a shift toward blue black if anything. I can achieve it on classic with SE6, but that stuff is super expensive!

Good luck with your tests. I doubt you would notice much difference trying LPD compared to your other developers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register