Tom Stanworth
Member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2003
- Messages
- 2,021
- Format
- Multi Format
Mind blowing optical performance (think Leica 35mm performance on 6x7 format) on fairly decent body. Body has its fiddly bits (compared to the (IMHO) ergonomically better RF645) but there is nothing that gives this level of performance with this portability (and lens options).
Fantastic travel camera. Wonderful for landscapes and very good for documentary work. Super quiet. MUCH quieter than a Leica M. Quietest camera I own.
Put one on a tripod and shoot a scene at f8-11 with fine grained film and then make a 20x24 inch print and tell me if you are not impressed.
Some say the lenses are 'wire sharp'. I think they are fine, but my goodness they are merciless. If you want to be kind to faces, you must load up with something with less resolution, like HP5 or TriX. I have plenty of images shot on TriX/HP5 that have old world charm despite being shot on these modern optics.
Then 65 is my favourite of the lot, not for performance as such, but the fact that it seems to be the ideal compromise FL (for me).
Fantastic travel camera. Wonderful for landscapes and very good for documentary work. Super quiet. MUCH quieter than a Leica M. Quietest camera I own.
Put one on a tripod and shoot a scene at f8-11 with fine grained film and then make a 20x24 inch print and tell me if you are not impressed.
Some say the lenses are 'wire sharp'. I think they are fine, but my goodness they are merciless. If you want to be kind to faces, you must load up with something with less resolution, like HP5 or TriX. I have plenty of images shot on TriX/HP5 that have old world charm despite being shot on these modern optics.
Then 65 is my favourite of the lot, not for performance as such, but the fact that it seems to be the ideal compromise FL (for me).