Once again, import fees for USA buyers of Japanese equipment post August 29, 2025

[BrianShaw]

Unfortunately, things are so in flux that you probably can't rely on the tariff tables to provide the total answer - like I say, it is a mess.

FWIW, the current official table was published on November 21, 2025 with a November 30 update. That is revision 31 so the there is considerable effort being made to keep them current. I’d bet that there is a legal statute requirement for current and accurate data for the public.

Flux happens. For some countries of origin timing matters. For others, less so.

 

[RezaLoghme]

FWIW, the current official table was published on November 21, 2025 with a November 30 update. That is revision 31 so the there is considerable effort being made to keep them current. I’d bet that there is a legal statute requirement for current and accurate data for the public.

What does it say about film cameras?
Have the changes made any impact on photographic equipment?

 

[Alan Edward Klein]

Actually, most overseas dealers are refusing to sell to US buyers except on ebay, etc

Too much work…

This came up in another thread. I found at least half a dozen American firms that handle import duties and tariffs for foreign sellers, for a fee of course. They don't take a percentage of the sale cost as eBay does, I don;t believe. Only a handling fee for the shipping and duties. It would be foolish for foreign exporters to abandon the US market if they're selling anything significant to America. Smart companies like B&H handle these VAT and other duty fees applied by countries throughout the world when they ship to them. Once they set it up, a program handles the charges automatically on their bills just as US state sales taxes in the 50 states are applied. Foreign companies could do the same thing.

 

[loccdor]

I used ChatGPT to check the total cost of importing a Leicaflex SL from Austria to the U.S.:

provided there is no special surcharge (e.g. under special trade programmes or country-of-origin restrictions).​

Anything on the Harmonized Tariff Schedule is in addition to the country-wide tariff rate. I found this out through trial and error.

 

[MattKing]

And it is the country-wide tariff that is the subject of most of the flux.
And the reason that many small exporters are pausing shipments to the USA - they know that customers who are hit with last minute, surprise bills often direct their anger to the original supplier.

 

[GregY]

And it is the country-wide tariff that is the subject of most of the flux.
And the reason that many small exporters are pausing shipments to the USA - they know that customers who are hit with last minute, surprise bills often direct their anger to the original supplier.

....rather than their own government that imposed the tariffs....

 

[loccdor]

All the Japanese eBayers I bought from who did not have "duties are included" on the listing made me confirm via message that I was ok with paying additional duties before they went forward with the sale. A wise thing to do regarding expensive international shipments on a site which has return policies that favor the buyer.

I was very satisfied with my last Japanese purchase, thanks for the indirect reminder to leave positive feedback.

 

[Alan Edward Klein]

And it is the country-wide tariff that is the subject of most of the flux.
And the reason that many small exporters are pausing shipments to the USA - they know that customers who are hit with last minute, surprise bills often direct their anger to the original supplier.

Japanese camera equipment sellers don't seem to fear this problem. Maybe they're very dependent on the American market and their volumes are relatively larger than sales from sellers from other countries.

 

[Arthurwg]

I recently tried to buy a camera bag from Taiwan. I was told the tariff would be 37%, collected by FedEx, plus a FedEx fee of $4.50 or 2% of the declared value.

 

[samuel-k]

All the Japanese eBayers I bought from who did not have "duties are included" on the listing made me confirm via message that I was ok with paying additional duties before they went forward with the sale. A wise thing to do regarding expensive international shipments on a site which has return policies that favor the buyer.

I was very satisfied with my last Japanese purchase, thanks for the indirect reminder to leave positive feedback.

This was my exact experience with a Japanese seller last week and I paid the duty to DHL this morning (once they reached out to me).

 

[loccdor]

I recently tried to buy a camera bag from Taiwan. I was told the tariff would be 37%, collected by FedEx, plus a FedEx fee of $4.50 or 2% of the declared value.

Taiwan tariff is 20% so the rest of that must have come from its Harmonized Tariff Schedule entry. This is 0% for most cameras, but not for bags.

 

[dbrown57]

I send a calendar to friends in the US at Christmas - not only has the post increased but although their is no duty to pay I had to pay a 50p handling charge. Very good willish....

 

[RezaLoghme]

What do you think about developing a simple framework for us buyers to navigate the purchasing process, taking as much uncertainty out of the process and replacing it with structure and facts?

 

[loccdor]

1. Look up country tariff rate
2. Look up item classification on the HTS rate
3. Look up mail carrier's fees (seems harder to do, I haven't actually seen these listed online)

Add these together.

You may still be surprised... for example if someone marks something as a gift, or uses an incorrect HTS code on the forms. Or if your package gets opened by customs and assigned a different code.

Easiest for the buyer is if the seller sends the item "duties included". However, the buyer will probably end up overpaying in that case as the seller will want to make sure their flat shipping charge is high enough to not cost them money.

 

[Milpool]

I sold a used item last week (non-photography) to someone in the US. I hadn't tried to send anything to the US in some time and clearly my own mistake for not following this stuff more carefully but man it was a lousy experience. I should have realized Canada Post can't even accept a US-destined package now until the sender first pre-pays all this nonsense. I'm don't do these things very often but from now on obviously the selling price will be grossed up to cover duties etc.

 

[djdister]

Twice I've had to pay UPS for additional "brokerage fees" on top of any duty or tariff rates. They billed me days after I received the item.

 

[RezaLoghme]

So it seems that analog cameras are not much at risk in terms of unexpected extra costs, unless I am totally wrong?

 

[MattKing]

So it seems that analog cameras are not much at risk in terms of unexpected extra costs, unless I am totally wrong?

They are at the same risk as everything else - as the extra charges are frequently item independent, but rather related to the vagaries of the politics.

 

[BrianShaw]

So it seems that analog cameras are not much at risk in terms of unexpected extra costs, unless I am totally wrong?

Unfortunately, you might be significantly (but not totally) wrong. The most concerning and variable aspect of today's tarrif situation is related to fluctuating rates based on country-of-origin, with the exception of some "critical technologies/materials". Cameras seem unaffected by the technology-based aspect but caught up in the country-or-origin aspect.

 

[RezaLoghme]

They are at the same risk as everything else - as the extra charges are frequently item independent, but rather related to the vagaries of the politics.

With respect, I’m not seeing any concrete risk here when it comes to used film cameras. A used 35 mm Leica from 1969–70, properly declared, falls under HTSUS 9006.59 — duty-free. The only minor variables would be misclassification on the customs form, a rare inspection, or carrier fees. For a single camera in the €150–€500 range, all of these are minimal. The “politics” argument certainly applies to high-value mass imports, or products of a certain kind (e.g. EV cars), not one vintage analog camera.

Most of the vintage cameras Photrio members care about are either German-made (Leica, Voigtländer, Zeiss Ikon, etc.)or Japanese-made (Nikon, Canon, Olympus, Minolta, Pentax). From a U.S. import perspective, that’s reassuring:

• Germany and Japan have long-standing trade agreements with the U.S., so the duty rates for used cameras are typically very low, often 0% if correctly classified.
• The real risk comes not from the country but from mis-declaring origin or the HTS code, or from unpredictable surcharges that sometimes pop up—but those are generally rare for pre-owned analog gear.
• Essentially, if you declare a German Leica or a Japanese Nikon properly, you’re unlikely to face extra fees beyond standard shipping.

So while there’s always some “political flux,” for these common vintage cameras the actual tariff and duty exposure is small, and shouldn’t deter buying them.
THIS WAS ASSISTED BY AI AND MAY CONTAIN INACCURACIES

 

[MattKing]

It would be a lot simpler world if the official customs tariff was the only thing affecting the current charges imposed for anyone trying to import something to the USA.
But it isn't.

 

[RezaLoghme]

It would be a lot simpler world if the official customs tariff was the only thing affecting the current charges imposed for anyone trying to import something to the USA.
But it isn't.

What other things are affecting the charges then, and how critical is that in the context of used film cameras (what most Photrio members are interested in )?

For vintage German or Japanese cameras, the import cost to the U.S. is usually very low. Example: a 1960s Rolleiflex bought in Germany for €1,000 would face 0% duty under HTSUS 9006.59, plus standard shipping/inspection fees—maybe $0–$50. Even in a worst-case extreme scenario (a punitive 25% country-specific tariff when the POTUS suddenly decides to start punishing Germany or Japan), the extra cost would be around $275. Most pre-owned cameras of interest to Photrio members fall into this category, so the “uncertain tariffs” worry is mostly overblown.
THIS WAS ASSISTED BY AI AND MAY CONTAIN INACCURACIES

 

[RezaLoghme]

THIS WAS ASSISTED BY AI AND MAY CONTAIN INACCURACIESTHIS WAS ASSISTED BY AI AND MAY CONTAIN INACCURACIESAs of November 2025:

• U.S.–Germany: There are currently no additional tariffs on film cameras (HTS 9006.59) from Germany. Pre-owned or vintage cameras fall under the same classification. Duty is effectively 0 %. Minor shipping or customs broker fees are the main costs.
• U.S.–Japan: Same story. Cameras made in Japan, whether new or used, also carry 0 % duty under the same HTS code.

So for the bulk of classic cameras enthusiasts on forums care about — Leicas, Rollei, Nikon F-series, Contax, etc. — the actual tariff risk is extremely low.

Sure, customs can theoretically reclassify, but in real life, for German or Japanese cameras, that rarely happens. So if you’re planning to import vintage gear from these countries, you’re mainly just looking at shipping costs, not surprise tariffs.

TL/DR
Even if the political sky falls, for vintage German or Japanese cameras imported to the U.S., the real tariff risk is extremely low. You agree, Matt?

 

[RezaLoghme]

THIS WAS ASSISTED BY AI AND MAY CONTAIN INACCURACIESWhat’s volatile — and what isn’t

Yes, general tariffs have been raised on some EU goods. In early 2025, the U.S. threatened and even partly applied broad tariffs on a range of European exports.

Sectors under particular stress — cars, steel, manufacturing — saw significant disruptions. Retaliation from the EU, counter‑moves, and general trade-policy uncertainty created a climate of unpredictability.

But here’s the key point: this volatility has affected large-value, industrial categories, not low-volume, non-strategic consumer or collectible items like vintage cameras. For camera collectors and buyers of German or Japanese gear, the practical risk remains very low.

 

[cowanw]

But here’s the key point: this volatility has affected large-value, industrial categories, not low-volume, non-strategic consumer or collectible items like vintage cameras. For camera collectors and buyers of German or Japanese gear, the practical risk remains very low.

Duty, if necessary, is paid by the recipient on arrival. The new American tariffs must be paid before the item is accepted for being sent from the seller. As Milpool has said, this means that, in our case, Canada Post must, through it's agents, take the tariff money before it accepts the package. If the US agent that receives the item judges the item is labelled wrongly then it refuses the package and the Canadian agent (Canada Post) must store it safely it until the problem is solved, which it has no facilities to do.
Therefor the tariff charge must be the highest possible to avoid refusal at the US border.
You don't seem to go beyond the dictionary definition of duty and tariffs without appreciating the practical difference, particularly since the US has decided, uniquely, that the tariffs must be collected in the sending country before the item enters the postal system, regardless of the duty rate. Nor do the documents you quote in any way address the Tariff rates which are independent of duty rates