If you want a mechanical body on which to fit OM lenses while using an external meter, forget the OM3 and the disproportionate collectors' prices it brings and buy an OM1 instead. With the OM3's elaborate metering system taken out of the equation, the only real difference between them is the OM3's 1/2000th shutter speed, which I'm guessing you won't miss in the middle of winter.
I kind of figured you were itching for an OM3.That is sound reasoning. Also having a light meter in my pocket would mitigate battery's going dead in the cold. However I rarely use reason when making camera purchases. That's why my other 35mm camera is a Contax RTS, with the same focal length lenses as my OM kit. Although the OM1 has nostalgic value (first 35mm camera I shot with), this just might be the reason, irrational as it is, for getting the OM 3 I've lusted for so long.
I do appreciate you trying to save me from myself.
There's the rub. Don't get me wrong I'd love an OM3 too, but sometimes I have to remind myself that this is analog photography, where the image quality of say an OM10 and an OM3Ti will be more or less identical with the same lens and film despite the fact the 3Ti could cost me 100x more to buy. That's usually enough to drag me back to reality.Was thinking of the OM 3 as a companion camera for my OM 4Ti. Then again I would feel very foolish if I bought an OM 3 and have someone say"you could have overhauled your OM 4Ti and bought a Zuiko 21mm 2.0 for what you paid for that camera".
Why do you trust your OM2n more than your OM4Ti?Try an OM-2n. For a lot less than an OM-4 or OM-3, but equally good with an excellent viewfinder. I still love my OM-4ti, but I trust my OM-2n a lot more.
lol! There's a really tidy one on eBay at the moment from Japan. Think it's about $2000 or thereabouts (certainly will be by the time I've paid import tax on it, were I to buy it). Looks nice but for best part of $2k it isn't even truly 'new in box', and the same money will keep me in film+processing for about 20 years. By then I'll be too old to care.I was coming back to reality then Ken N shows up with that avatar of his
By design, actually an improved OM-2, it has been proven to be reliable with simple electronics that just work. OM-4 has not been renowned for the longevity of its electronics. OM-4ti has improved by quite a bit, but eventually things start to collapse starting with LCD bleeding in the viewfinder.Why do you trust your OM2n more than your OM4Ti?
I guess I have a ways to go before I get to eventually with my OM4Ti. My OM4 still works fine too, though I have to replace the batteries every 4-6 months. It's a fair trade-off for spot metering.By design, actually an improved OM-2, it has been proven to be reliable with simple electronics that just work. OM-4 has not been renowned for the longevity of its electronics. OM-4ti has improved by quite a bit, but eventually things start to collapse starting with LCD bleeding in the viewfinder.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?