Minoltafan2904
Allowing Ads
Amen.
We don't pack 9mm S&W, we pack 8mm B&H.
I like that, even if it is a typoThe data sheep suggests
New March 2018 data sheet provided by KODAK on T-Max P3200 TMZ: http://imaging.kodakalaris.com/sites/prod/files/files/products/F4001.pdf
Pre-order T-Max P3200 TMZ here at CineStill: Dead Link Removed
I agree as long as they are genuine black and white. I have occasionally seen the grey border breed and they are real "dogs"And this is why we need border collies on APUG!
I agree as long as they are genuine black and white. I have occasionally seen the grey border breed and they are real "dogs"
pentaxuser
Some of my Border collie owned friends do like the RED ones. (Border Collies own their humans and no the other way around.)Mine was tricolored, black, brown, and white, with a black saddle.
Border Collies own their humans and no the other way around.
I wonder if those sheep are the electric version, and if there are androids who dream of them.
I'm happy P3200 is back. I switched to Delta 3200 when it was discontinued. While Delta is a great film, I have some 12"x16" prints on my wall made from 35mm where the grain is obvious but not intrusive, but for me the grain structure is a little too regular. P3200 seemed to have a more varied grain structure that was less obvious is sections of light tone, though the difference is marginal. Mind you, I only switched to P3200 when Neopan 1600 was discontinued. I loved that film...
I suppose the main question that a newcomer to both films might ask is : At what enlargement does the difference become obvious and of the prints from both films, which seems to be visually "less grainy"?For lack of a better term, I found P3200 to have more varied, lumpy grain compared to the rather sharp grain of Delta.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?