Connection by standard sync cable and if necessary additional by sync adapter from the accessory trade. Only automatic-flash-mode or manual-flash-mode are possible.
It has no technical advantage, it's simply beautiful. Being a beautiful thing and being done with beautiful things is the core of classic photography, at least the way that I intend it.I do not see the advantage of the CT-5 display.
Thank you, this settles the issue I suppose. May I ask you from where did you quote that sentence?Yes, CT-5 version I missed that, in that case it indicates the following for the Metz 45 CT-5/F3 combination:
It has no technical advantage, it's simply beautiful. Being a beautiful thing and being done with beautiful things is the core of classic photography, at least the way that I intend it.
I now realized that at the back of its reflector head the CT-5 has a LED figure display (It is not hinted at in the manual, thus I did not realize.)
Something the later type 45 models did not get.
I guess If ever I come across a CT-5 I might take it just for this...
...By the way - how I wish that Nikon put a LED display in the F3 rather than that awful LCD display, which was described as short-lasting even in the user's manual... It's disconcerting how they knew since the beginning that it was not a smart choice, but actually the weakest part of the camera...
Marco you're right! I used Metz 45 CT-1 for more than 20 years only relying on it's measuring exposure cell and it always performed flawlessly. Sorry that you can't find right system info but I'm sure that it will work nice without dedicated adapterActually, the built-in esposure computer of the 45 CT-5 works wonderfully, and I never really felt that I needed something else in order to get well exposed pictures.
Good point. I didn’t notice.This listing is not complete as it lacks SCA adapter 345. Let alone alone adapters from the earlier adapter series. As this listing seems from Metz themselves, it shows how confusion is to arise.
Lucky you. I have instead just one F3/T, the "indestructible" camera made with the miracle metal, the super-ultra-professional machine for the super-ultra-professionist who will be at the north pole, in the savana and inside an erupting volcano at the same time, and the only not working part is (go figure) that lame LCD display. So in my opinion Nikon really took it right: that LCD display was poo and they even knew it, but they put it there nonetheless. "Professional" indeed. Give me the display of a Canon A1, please!I have 8 Nikon F3HP's, and every one of them has a bright, clear LCD display, even after 38 years. Looks to me like Nikon got that wrong.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?