Nikon F2 vs FM handling in use

first-church.jpg

D
first-church.jpg

  • 3
  • 2
  • 17
Grape Vines

A
Grape Vines

  • sly
  • May 31, 2025
  • 1
  • 0
  • 17
Plot Foiled

H
Plot Foiled

  • 1
  • 0
  • 29
FedEx Bread

H
FedEx Bread

  • 1
  • 0
  • 30
Unusual House Design

D
Unusual House Design

  • 4
  • 2
  • 69

Forum statistics

Threads
197,970
Messages
2,767,418
Members
99,516
Latest member
Fuji_Bro
Recent bookmarks
0

snusmumriken

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Messages
2,394
Location
Salisbury, UK
Format
35mm
Another thing I can't figure out, does the early model FM (with the shutter lock around the button) still require the advance lever to be pulled out to fire the shutter? That sounds pretty annoying and might turn me off the FE/FM

I am actually left-eye-dominant, so the lever in 'on' position poked me in the other eye. Still, one quickly gets used to it, and it is much better than a separate on/off switch.

When I was much younger and had an FE from new, I used to compare cameras with other young friends, and the Olympus OM-1 was the camera I always wished I had bought instead. Everything about the Olympus, including the lenses, is smaller. Nikon FE or FM use Nikon lenses designed for the larger Nikon cameras. The viewfinder on the Olympus is also brighter. The FE viewfinder lops off quite a big margin, supposedly for a slide mount. You can see both shutter speed and aperture in the viewfinder, but the aperture is literally a window on the lens barrel via a little prism, so in dim light you can't see it.

On the positive side, I sold my FE in full working order, nothing broke in the 20 years I had it, despite it being used mainly for work in challenging outdoor conditions, including north of the arctic circle.
 

Les Sarile

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
3,418
Location
Santa Cruz, CA
Format
35mm
I am actually left-eye-dominant, so the lever in 'on' position poked me in the other eye. Still, one quickly gets used to it, and it is much better than a separate on/off switch.

Complete opposite to that old saying about something is better than getting poked in the eye with a sharp stick . . .

I recall Herb Keppler's review of the FM and that after his wife got poked in the eye that she swore off it. I guess she didn't get used to it . . .
 
OP
OP
Madeleine Ostoja
Joined
Oct 2, 2020
Messages
45
Location
New Zealand
Format
Medium Format
Thanks for the input everyone! In the end I grabbed a Nikon F. It’s a touch smaller and quieter than the F2, and most importantly about half the price. I'll have to come around to the hard-edge aesthetics :smile: and I've already found a Nikon F4 screen I can transplant when I CLA it so it's nice and bright.

From what everyone has said the FM/FE's don't sound that different to the OM2 I already have access to, and if I want something really compact I can grab my beloved Leica iif. Also, after looking into lenses, having something designed for pre-ai glass will be a blessing on my budget. The Nikkor-HC 50/2 sounds equal or better to the summaron I just spent a small fortune on, and can be had for peanuts.
 
Last edited:

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format
Thanks for the input everyone! In the end I grabbed a Nikon F. It’s a touch smaller and quieter than the F2, and most importantly about half the price. I'll have to come around to the hard-edge aesthetics :smile: and I've already found a Nikon F4 screen I can transplant when I CLA it so it's nice and bright.

From what everyone has said the FM/FE's don't sound that different to the OM2 I already have access to, and if I want something really compact I can grab my beloved Leica iif. Also, after looking into lenses, having something designed for pre-ai glass will be a blessing on my budget. The Nikkor-HC 50/2 sounds equal or better to the summaron I just spent a small fortune on, and can be had for peanuts.
Excellent choice, as long as it's a good one to start with, you'll have it for a very long time. The Nikkor H/ HC is absolutely first-rate, I have one for each of 5 bodies - a couple came free and the most expensive one, an HC, was thirty-something with shipping. Also, I used my '68 F semi-professionally until 1999-2000 or so, they're that reliable if taken care of.

If you get a chance for a bargain, an F2 handles very much like an F except for the shutter release, and having a modern battery housed in the body, not the meter head, is a nice improvement. Shutter speeds from 1/2000 down to 10 sec., a better mirror lockup, some other improvements. Just as reliable as an F, but the F2s usually need a cla to get an actual 1/2000, and the Fs might be better in the cold, again if clean and properly lubricated.
P.S. Just pop the finder off the F and the screen will come right out.
 

Nitroplait

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 13, 2020
Messages
790
Location
Europe (EU)
Format
Multi Format
It is the most beautiful camera of the last century, in a brutalist kind of way.

52483895490_a89946d8dc_k.jpg

The 50/2.0 and the 35/2.0 rivals my Summicrons of same focal lengths. Good choice 👍
 

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format
It is the most beautiful camera of the last century, in a brutalist kind of way.

52483895490_a89946d8dc_k.jpg

The 50/2.0 and the 35/2.0 rivals my Summicrons of same focal lengths. Good choice 👍
And the 105/2.5 Sonnar is pretty damn nice too.
My 35/2 Nikkor-O came free, a friend sent it to Nikon for repair, Nikon had stopped servicing pre-AI lenses by then, maybe '92 or '3. The aperture was jammed by a floating screw, took me maybe 25 minutes to repair. The lens shows ~20 years of pro use, lots of naked aluminum, but the focus is smooth and tight, glass clean. The stuff is very durable with a bit of care.
 

Ariston

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2019
Messages
1,658
Location
Atlanta
Format
Multi Format
Thanks for the input everyone! In the end I grabbed a Nikon F. It’s a touch smaller and quieter than the F2, and most importantly about half the price.

If price is a primary concern and, as you say, you don't care about the meter, you should find an FM with an inoperative meter and you'll get it for cheap. I think I paid $30 for mine. You can add it to your F as a (lighter) backup.
 

Les Sarile

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
3,418
Location
Santa Cruz, CA
Format
35mm
It seems a popular myth that these only come well worn and beaten. However, those nice leather cases must've protected them quite a bit and likely prevented them from being used more often too! A plain prism F came up complete with leather case, lens and many other accessories as well as original receipt. Owner was a USAF pilot who bought it on a tour in Asia. Was on the lookout for a PP F2 when another PP F showed up also looking good. Not long after a PP F2 became available.

F_F2_F by Les DMess, on Flickr
 
OP
OP
Madeleine Ostoja
Joined
Oct 2, 2020
Messages
45
Location
New Zealand
Format
Medium Format
Yep the only blemish on the one I bought is a very small dent below the film advance. Unfortunately the prism has the tiniest hint of corrosion along the top edge, but that's why I got it for a good price. I'll clean out the offending foam gunk so it doesn't get worse and if I love it / it bugs me I'll swap out the prism one day
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom